Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forest Service Chief Defends Bush Budget - AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 07:24 PM
Original message
Forest Service Chief Defends Bush Budget - AP
Forest Service Chief Defends Bush Budget
By MATTHEW DALY
Associated Press Writer

February 13, 2007, 6:20 PM EST

WASHINGTON -- Congressional Democrats dismissed as "unworkable" the first budget
request of new Forest Service Chief Gail Kimbell.

Kimbell, the first woman to head the Forest Service, came under fire Tuesday as she
defended President Bush's request for the next budget year, which deals her agency
a spending cut and eliminates more than 2,100 jobs.

-snip-

Even so, it would boost spending to fight forest fires by 23 percent to $911 million -- a
recognition that firefighting costs have topped $1 billion in four of the past seven years.
Lawmakers from both parties have criticized the Forest Service in the past for under-
budgeting for fire expenses, noting that money is often taken from other accounts to pay
for fire suppression.

Still, Dicks said the budget request has "big problems." While it increases spending for fire
suppression, it cuts money for fire preparedness, work done to thin overcrowded forest to
reduce the risk of fire.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-forest-service-budget,0,2881797.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. This makes no sense...

with this proposed budget, The Forest Service cuts 2,100 jobs, but increases the
budget for fire fighting? Are fire fighters amongst the 2,100 who will lose their jobs?
And if so, who's profitting in this? Am I missing something here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why, they'll just hire temps, silly!
Or maybe they can get some inexpensive prison labor to come and cut firebreaks for them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Full-time staff like rangers, maintenence workers, and road crews get cut.
Firefighters are are brought in when they are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC