Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Zealand Fishermen Catch Rare (990 lb) Squid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:32 AM
Original message
New Zealand Fishermen Catch Rare (990 lb) Squid
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/tech/2007/feb/22/022205192.html

A fishing crew has caught a colossal squid that could weigh a half-ton and prove to be the biggest specimen ever landed, a fisheries official said Thursday.

The squid, weighing an estimated 990 lbs and about 39 feet long, took two hours to land in Antarctic waters, New Zealand Fisheries Minister Jim Anderton said.

The fishermen were catching Patagonian toothfish, sold under the name Chilean sea bass, south of New Zealand "and the squid was eating a hooked toothfish when it was hauled from the deep," Anderton said.

The fishing crew and a fisheries official on board their ship estimated the length and weight of the squid: Detailed, official measurements have not been made. The date when the colossus was caught also was not disclosed.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornflake_31 Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ok.......
I'm never going swimming again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. My God it's Dick Cheney


With his tentacles in all the $$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. why bother?
who's going to eat that squid? its a trophy. more pointless death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. So they were fishing for a species that is HIGHLY ENDANGERED
and being fished out of existence, and then they caught (and presumably killed) another species that is rarely seen, or at least a prime example of it, so they could take pictures and then throw it back (nobody eats 990 lb squid, to they?).

Makes pefect sense to me. If you're looking to contribute to ecosystem collapse that it..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I was surprised to see commercial fishing in Antarctic waters
I was under the mis-impression that it was banned under the Antarctic Treaty...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sadly not...
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 04:03 PM by Dead_Parrot
...The southern ocean is sub-divided into sections (=fisheries), which are (in theory) controlled by CCAMLR as to what can be caught where - but there's enough illegal fishing to make it pretty worthless.

http://www.ccamlr.org/pu/e/gen-intro.htm , if you want to go digging...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We encountered several NZ toothfish boats South of 60 a few years back
We became their de facto icebreaker for several days and saved them a shiteload of fuel (and $$$).

Until then, I wasn't aware there was commercial fishing that far south.

(and the size of that squid answers the question about that large fast-moving underwater object I saw one day in a lead)...

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Considering it's supposed to be one of the world's last wildernesses
the southern ocean seems to be frighteningly busy. We really need some sort of oversight on what's going on down there...

Oh well. A few more years and the problem will go away. :(

Incidentally, I misread you last line as:

that large fast-moving underwater object I saw one day in the head

Yikes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Spsppppsssshhh!!11111
they only move fast when the cook is drunk...or when you hit the "delete" buttoon...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. No, they're taking it to a museum
"There was quite a lot of excitement onboard ... the decision was taken that the chances of survival were not good, and in the interests of science it should be taken on board," Dolan said.

Sanford's deepwater division manager Greg Johansson said the squid was barely alive when it was pulled aboard.

"It was deemed that is was more valuable to science," Johansson said.

The squid was taken below deck and stored in a 1200 litre capacity bin, before it was frozen.

It has since been transferred to one of the company's cool rooms in Timaru, on New Zealand's South Island.

It will ultimately end up at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa in Wellington, where it will be preserved for scientific study.

http://www.thewest.com.au/aapstory.aspx?StoryName=358479
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. How did it get so large?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. They are Toothfish (aka Antarctic Cod) predators
Toothfish are big nasty predators in their own right (up to 2 meters long and weighing up to 135 kg).

They have to be bigger badder than their prey...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. By not being caught until now ...?
Maybe it was a rhetorical question but the answer is still "by continuing to
eat without being caught and killed". This is why the average catch size is
diminishing in every fishery across the globe. Sad isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC