Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warming Oceans Contain Less Oxygen For Fish - Dead Zone Numbers May Rise Sharply - Scripps Scientist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 01:11 PM
Original message
Warming Oceans Contain Less Oxygen For Fish - Dead Zone Numbers May Rise Sharply - Scripps Scientist
VICTORIA -- As the temperature of the world's oceans increases due to global warming, there may be more and more areas where oxygen in the water is either limited or absent, and that could have a deadly effect on huge numbers of marine species, a U.S. biological oceanographer warned a conference on the future of the world's oceans Thursday.

Lisa Levin, who works out of the Integrative Oceanography Division at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif., told an audience at the University of Victoria that most so-called "dead zones" are caused by excessive levels of nitrogen being dumped into the oceans. Nitrogen is a component of most commercial fertilizers, and rivers carry the residue of these fertilizers from farms to the ocean, she said.

When this happens, she explained, the number of nitrogen-consuming phytoplankton rises. This, in turn, prompts a concomitant rise in the number of microbes that feed on the phytoplankton -- microbes that collectively consume great quantities of oxygen. As a consequence, the number of man-made dead zones -- areas of the ocean where oxygen is either depleted or gone -- has grown to more than 150 in the last 50 years, some of them several thousand square kilometres in size.

But now, because of global warming, Levin said, it's possible that the number of such zones, where fish that need oxygen can't thrive, could rise even higher. "People are only beginning to study these second-order effects of global warming," she said. "But it's certainly an area that's worth watching."

EDIT

http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=3b46d225-f640-4ce5-af2a-f52a4e8d2b40
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. no, wait, let me guess: faster than expected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. More, but hardly unexpected, bad news. Recommended. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. "People are only beginning to study these second-order effects of global warming"
Just wait for the third-, fourth-, and fifth-order effects...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. That conference in Vctoria sounds like it's a laff riot.
Edited on Fri Feb-23-07 02:42 PM by GliderGuider
Scientist after scientist coming to the podium with a grim expression and a fist full of black-bordered Powerpoint slides.

"Hey, Dr. Finagle, Dr. Murphy - how bad are you guys going to say things are?"
"Well, Dr. Sod, I have irrefutable calculations that show the human race will be toast by Wednesday, July 17, 2079."
"Hell, that's nothing! I've got figures here that say the whole oceanic ecosystem is going to collapse by the middle of 2061."
"Ha, I've go you both beat! According to my numbers, the entire planetary ecosphere is going to dissolve into a thin layer of grey goo at 3:48 p.m. Saturday October 18, 2033!"
"Cool, you win. I'll buy lunch."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, at least they're not talking about people who could be killed by
"dangerous nuclear waste."

We need to count our blessings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC