|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
PeaceForever (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:40 AM Original message |
Why can't we physically reduce CO2 in the atmosphere? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
1. Sure, but how much energy will it take? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldmund (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. ...and will the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceForever (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Good question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
4. Can't do it cuz we have to keep knocking down trees to make way for roads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
5. For the same reason we can't synthesize ozone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
punpirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
6. Energy balance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jay-3d (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. iron |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 11:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. IIRC pilot studies did not produce the expected results.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
punpirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 11:09 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Here's an article supporting that: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
8. Lots of problems with this kind of thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
9. there have been several proposals for physically removing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. by the way: this is an issue for many alternate energy plans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
factroid (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 03:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. hydrogen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. it might work, but details matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
factroid (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. the simple solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. This is dangerous territory because it appeals to perpetual motion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bdog (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-25-04 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
17. Bush cut the funding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CabalPowered (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-30-04 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
18. 3rd Law of Thermodynamics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 02:34 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Third law of thermodynamics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 02:36 AM Response to Original message |
20. Plant a tree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 11:21 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Good point doc. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceForever (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 06:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Yes, but I thought trees make only a tiny dent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 07:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Interesting article... different answers than mine (see below) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
22. I had a homework problem related to this a couple of years ago... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceForever (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 06:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I'll be interested in the answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 07:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Answers (fwiw) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 07:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. These are reasonable values, and look acheivable on their face. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 08:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Yeah- Perkins thought of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 09:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. The problem with limestone is that one needs to make hydroxides as a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bdog (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Joseph C. McNeil Generating Station Wood fuel facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 07:39 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Well, it's safer than coal, but not safer than nuclear. Wood burning link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 01:13 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Nuke energy = risk minimized energy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 01:52 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Wrong. Solar energy, except for wind, is not safer than nuclear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 07:52 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I apologize - I was unclear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 08:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. You're right about that type of solar energy. It's very safe, and very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bdog (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-03-04 02:50 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Its not 10% its 1% of federally mandated emission levels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-04-04 12:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. To zero? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pol (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-02-04 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
30. Better Ways to Do It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC