Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

arming merchant ships as a solution to piracy problem?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:40 PM
Original message
arming merchant ships as a solution to piracy problem?
well i shouldnt say a complete solution- but in my opinion it would help. On the open ocean help is sometimes days away leaving ships to fend for themselves.

I think that even a few shotguns on board a merchant ship (with some crew training) would go along way in helping...it would atleast give the crew a fighting chance to repel the attack (first rule of a gun fight- bring a gun).

It may even making piracy less palatable...seeing that once easy money isn't so easy anymore

What do you guys think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. A couple of .50s for and aft sure would make them think twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm surprised that they don't regularly have armed guards on board.
I think I always just assumed that they had at least a small security force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dumb, dumb and dumb. As I posted earlier on another thread
the amount of traffic on the ocean at any given time in huge. If everyone fired off "warning" shots everytime another ship came along, travel and trade would come to a stand still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. There are ways to see what the intentions of that other ship are from a distance. They are holding
nasty weapons in their hands and speeding towards the ship is a good clue they are Pirates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Well golly, I thought it was the Jolly Roger that really gave them away.
Is this the same logic that says all criminals are unshaven and poorly dressed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Nope. It's not the Jolly Roger waving but the AK-47s in their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. So the pirates come at the ship at a high rate of speed
waving AKs and acting like idiots? I'm sorry I haven't read that Clive Cussler book yet.If this is the case, why doesn't the Capt. order the ship to full speed? Or better, Flank 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. LOL. You are kidding right? I ask because it was very funny
reading that post. I hope it was intentional. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Why is that funny. Tankers are able to outrun smaller ships in open ocean
Edited on Sun Apr-12-09 04:21 PM by Arctic Dave
because they have less surface area to make up because they can cut through the water. I'm going to geuess you don't know what flank 3 is, is the ship version of shitin' and gettin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I hate to resort to this but. . .please source that. What are the speeds
of the cargo ships and the boats that the pirates have? If what you are saying is true then ALL the hijacked ships just allowed themselves to be taken. I seriously believe you are in error on the speeds of the boats involved so please city where you get this information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I'll give you half the answer. Cargo ships average 20 knots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Here is the average for cargo ships
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_top_speed_of_a_cargo_ship

As for the "pirate ship", if the pictures that were shown earlier are an accurate description I would have guess(yes this a guess)would be 10kn. Why, because an open bow fiberglass boat is heavy, it appeared to using an undersized outboard motor and if the conditions in Somalia are as bad as people say, I don't think these guys are using a high performance motor.

The only two advantages the "pirates" have is the small size of their boat (this will help them evade most radar) and two they can blend in with the hundereds of other boats that the cargo ship will encounter during their voyage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
57. The pirates are using whatever they can get their hands on.
Including stolen fishing vessels that have no business in deep waters. So you're not going to get an absolute comparison here. Clearly SOME of the pirate ships are fast enough, or the pilots are savvy enough to work out an intercept.

Some are not, and some of those are never heard from again. High seas are dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. often these large ships
can't outrun or out maneuver these small speed boats....they try to fend them off with fire hoses...but even those have proven ineffective at times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Actually on the open ocean they can out run them no problem.
The have the ability to cut straight through the swells. If pirates are in small boats they do not have that ability, because they have to cover more surface area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. So what exactly is the speeds of the boats and ships involved? And
please source this information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Here is half the answer. Cargo ships average 20 knots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I would have to speculate on that, if the pictures shown are a
realistic description, I would guess 10kn tops. You also have to factor in the speed and boat type would result in nil for any type of accuracy while firing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. LMFAO!!! You REALLY need to do some research and stop guessing.
A Heritage ROW BOAT can average 6 knots. LMFAO!!!! Care to revise your "guess". HaHaHa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Not at all. Read my other post and you will see why.
It doesn't even include the years in the Navy when I witnessed both kind of boats in action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. If you really had that kind of experience then you surly would not
be trying to get someone to believe what is so patently false on its face. The fact is that these cargo ships are very slow. The pirates are using what is often called "speed boats" in the press to catch them. It does not take much at all to push a 20 foot boat to 40 or even 50 knots in open water. It is obvious you have never spent any time in a Boston Whaler fishing boat. Seriously, do a little looking into the matter. Your posts didn't seem right to me on my limited knowledge so I did a little looking into it. You are just plain wrong on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Your right, I'm trying to bed you sweetheart.
If you knew jackshit about open ocean cargoship, or ocean going anything for that matter you wouldn't be so mouthy. As for a Boston Whaler, give me a break, the eighties are over, along with that brandname (not that these guys were using them anyways). I would stick to things you no more about, whatever that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Must have struck pretty close to the mark for you to get so worked up there.
Edited on Sun Apr-12-09 07:28 PM by Hoopla Phil
Fact, Cargo ships are slow.

Fact, the Somali pirates are using boats that go much faster than their targets.

Saying otherwise as often as you can will not change those two facts. Claiming personal knowledge will not change those two facts. Making personal attacks or trying to provoke a response by calling me "sweetheart" will not change those two facts. Have a nice day.

It's also funny to note your attack on the Boston Whaler example I gave. You did not attack the facts but tried to sluff it off as "that's so eighty's" HaHaHa. I've proven my point now so you go on the attack. Smooth. . . LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Slow, hardly.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_top_speed_of_a_ca...

Large ship move faster in open ocean because they are able "plow" through the surface of the ocean (think aircraft carrier). Small ship cannot do this, they have to travel along more surface area.
When at high speeds small boats have less stablity then large ships, making them inappropriate platforms for shooting. Even if they are the unsinkable Boston Whaler. What is the Somali version of that anyways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Yep that average of 20 knots is blazing fast ain't it. LOL
Edited on Sun Apr-12-09 07:50 PM by Hoopla Phil
You cannot alter the facts as much as you say it is so. HaHaHa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. For a ship that can be 3 football fields long or more, it is technical marvel.
I think that part will be lost on you.

However I encourage you to find out firsthand. Catch a flight the nearest port. See if you can get a trip on an ocean freighter and see what it can do. Next get any small skiff and head to open water. See if you can tell the difference.
Rerport back with your info so you can school me with you real life knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Now your posts are getting comical.
Edited on Sun Apr-12-09 08:38 PM by Hoopla Phil
?w=500&h=311

I bet it can go faster than the 10 knots you "guessed" earlier. LOL

Face the facts. The pirate boats are faster than the cargo ships. Plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. An unidentified boat, umm, ok, you win.
I can totally see how the overtook a the ship. I don't see the AKs a wagging. Are they next to the life vest?

Were is a cargo ship at full speed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. LOL. Deni the facts all you want but the facts are the facts.
The boats that the Somali pirates use are indeed faster than the cargo ships they hijack. OH, you know, you COULD follow the link and read the article if you want to. I guess it's just better to keep your fingers in your ears and sing lalalalalal.

So tell me again how a ship that has a slower speed than the pirate boats out runs the pirate boats. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Some of the pirate vessels are faster.
Some are not, and have to manage to intercept from ahead, or go home empty handed. That much has been clearly reported by many news sources. In high seas, they can be battered apart, or unable to pursue anything in a straight line. Some of these pirate vessels never make it back to port at all. Some are slow, diesel, littoral fishing vessels, often stolen from poor, struggling fishermen or fleets.

We're talking about a spectrum of ships, some able, some not, some in calm seas, some not. So technically, depending on all the factors involved, you are both correct. No reason to fight guys, take a deep breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. You just have to talk to me the way you do. No bubble here but beginning
to wonder bout you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. we are not talking about
artillery but handheld weapons- like a shotgun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
52. BLOOD IN THE OCEANS, OK CORRAL ON THE HIGH SEAS AAAAAAAA
Hyperbole aside, there are some practical reasons you can't do this. In order for merchant ships to have free passage through other nations waters, the ship must be unarmed. I don't mean just deck guns, but even personal armaments are no-go. Otherwise you'll spend a lot of time filling out forms, extra paperwork, submitting to shipwide searches that can take weeks, having to queue up and wait for months for harbor inspections, etc.

The port of destination pretty much sets the rules, and hundreds of international ports would be basically closed off to you immediately, if your merchant ship carried any firearms at all. Hence the water cannons, and other non-firearm countermeasures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gun Free Zones attract criminals. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm surprised they aren't ...
I figured out in international waters, they would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellbound-liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would think using something like this would make the NEXT group of pirates think twice
before attacking with AK-47s, which seems to be their current MO.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. I totally agree but was slammed for the same idea in another post.
This is outrageous that they have let this go on for so long without fully securing their ships with armor and guards. They can see that a pirate ship is approaching from a long distance. Use the same weapons the Pirates use and more if it is needed. They will soon get the message and back off. If not they are really crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. There are many ports
That will not allow an armed ship to enter for fear of piracy or attack. I imagine they could get around the restrictions by having an unarmed security force and stock things that could easily be turned into weapons. A couple of Molotov cocktails would probably serve as a deterrent to a speedboat trying to board a freighter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yay Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Does Less-than-leathal count as being armed?
Plenty of less-than-lethal options exists, but do they count as being "armed"?

Only problem is most of them are short range...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I can't see how they would be considered
"Armed" in the absence of firearms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Armed without arms. That's kinda funny if you think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yay Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
48. Well I know some countries
Edited on Sun Apr-12-09 08:39 PM by yay
Consider air rifles or even sling shots to be "firearms".

Personaly I say give the crew a couple people trained to use guns as apart of their crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Nope. We've learned today that in this situation the pirates did in fact
evade the less lethal defenses that the crew had used. Some 50s or even 20mm for and aft would be much better at defending the ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewMoonTherian Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. From what I heard...
The ship was equipped with water cannon(s) and some kind of sonic device. Never heard whether the crew actually employed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yes they did. I heard on the TV news that they had been fighting
the pirates for over 3 hours using the "less lethal" devises. Eventually the pirates did get through. Should have had 20mm cannons rather than water cannons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewMoonTherian Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #29
58. Aye to that.
Since posting this I heard an interview with a representative for the shipping company. He described the "sonic weapon" as "an incredible loud speaker". I couldn't shake the notion we're arming our freighters with Whitesnake surplus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
56. Compressed air harpoon guns.
You'd save money by not even bothering with the cable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's been under discussion for years.
so far, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. We could just equip all our vessels with Corbomite devices. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
46. LOL!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. I would say that security is a cost of doing business
and that the shipping companies need to invest in some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWorldJohn Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. ABC News why ships are unarmed
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=12903392&ch=4226714&src=news>ABC video, Why shipa are traveling without arms aboard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. i find some of those reasons silly
a right of innocent passage? Pirates arent going to adhere to that

I understand international concern but we arent talking about heavy munitions and military grade ship to ship weapons here....we are talking about a few shotguns or something to that effect.
something like in this link below
http://www.remington.com/products/firearms/shotguns/model_870/model_870_marine_magnum.asp

I believe we could change around some international laws to allow this...especially in pirate hot spots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. I figure there are two routes to go with this
One is regular small-arms, such as rifles, shotguns, and handguns.


The problem with this is that the crews are small and the ships are huge. The pirate can attack at any point on the sides of the vessel... this can be a couple of thousand feet long. Their motorboats move at 30 knots, perhaps, enabling them to dash to different sections of the gunwale while the crew is running around trying to get in position.

However a medium-caliber rifle with a scope, an M14 or equivilant, could probably hit a motorboat at a half-mile or more. Strategically places, a half-dozen crew with rifles could cover the entire perimeter of the ship, raining bullets on approaching or boarding speedboats. I don't see many pirates trying to shimmy 60 feet up a rope while two crewmen play target practice on him with .30-caliber rifles.

The downside is that trying to hit a pirate under those conditions would be difficult, and damage to the speedboat would likely be minimal. And of course, return fire is likely.




I think the best solution (which might not be legally possible) would be TOW or similar anti-tank missiles. Wire-guided by the operator, a range in excess of 2 miles, and a long enough flight time for the pirate to either turn tail or jump off the boat before the warhead impacts. I don't think they could dodge as long as the operator did his job.

A mount each in the bow and the stern would provide 360º protection at ranges far beyond that of an RPG or AK-47.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pullo Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
49. Somali pirates vow retaliation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. maybe we should listen to this guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umccoyw Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
54. i agree
i also agree that that crews on merchant ships should be able to carry firearms to protect themselves. Like anyone will tell you in the security and anti terrorism field is that you dont want to be a soft target because criminals and terrorists will go after the easiest target
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC