Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should bind people be allowed to carry concealed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:54 AM
Original message
Should bind people be allowed to carry concealed?

Law allowing blind to carry concealed guns intact
Jun 8, 2011 5:01am

LAWRENCE, Kan. (AP) — Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt has expressed concerns about changes to the concealed-carry law that prevents the state from denying gun permits to the blind and other people with serious physical disabilities.

The Legislature also has removed all requirements that people who wanted to renew their license must pass a close range accuracy Test

***snip***

The changes that took effect in 2010 removed language from the law giving the state the right to deny a license if applicants "suffer from a physical infirmity which prevents the safe handling of a weapon."

It also removed the requirement that people wanting to renew their licenses had to take a test in which they had to hit at least 18 of 25 targets from distances ranging from 3 yards to 10 yards. People applying for a license for the first time still are required to take the test.
http://www.necn.com/06/08/11/Law-allowing-blind-to-carry-concealed-gu/landing_politics.html?&blockID=3&apID=639d0cd39e51400c932a35dcd6188c23


Under Florida concealed carry law which is often used as the example for other states when they consider "shall issue" concealed carry:



Eligibility Requirements

You must be 21 years of age or older.
You must be able to demonstrate competency with a firearm.

***snip***

Possible Reasons for Ineligibility:

The physical inability to handle a firearm safely.
http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/weapons/eligible.html


Of course, you can be legally blind and possibly have enough vision to safely use a firearm at close range.


Various scales have been developed to describe the extent of vision loss and define blindness.<1> Total blindness is the complete lack of form and visual light perception and is clinically recorded as NLP, an abbreviation for "no light perception."<1> Blindness is frequently used to describe severe visual impairment with residual vision. Those described as having only light perception have no more sight than the ability to tell light from dark and the general direction of a light source.

In order to determine which people may need special assistance because of their visual disabilities, various governmental jurisdictions have formulated more complex definitions referred to as legal blindness.<2> In North America and most of Europe, legal blindness is defined as visual acuity (vision) of 20/200 (6/60) or less in the better eye with best correction possible. This means that a legally blind individual would have to stand 20 feet (6.1 m) from an object to see it—with corrective lenses—with the same degree of clarity as a normally sighted person could from 200 feet (61 m). In many areas, people with average acuity who nonetheless have a visual field of less than 20 degrees (the norm being 180 degrees) are also classified as being legally blind. Approximately ten percent of those deemed legally blind, by any measure, have no vision. The rest have some vision, from light perception alone to relatively good acuity. Low vision is sometimes used to describe visual acuities from 20/70 to 20/200.<3>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindness


I personally favor a requirement to pass a test at a gun range demonstrating that the applicant can safely handle a firearm.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds kinky....
Sorry, fun with typo's before being fully caffienated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is easy.
Pass a law that says if you're attacking a blind person, you have to say, "Polo!" every time the blind person says, "Marco!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. LOL. Good one. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. That's a hilarious image:
"Marco!" "Polo!"

"Marco!" "Polo!"

"Marco!" "Polo!" BLAM!

"Missed me, suck-" BLAM! BLAM!

...

"Fish out of water!" "Ooowwww...."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Holy christ.... wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. In all seriousness, if the person is only going to use the weapon at contact range...
and it's pretty easy to tell if someone is beating the shit out of you by hand, I have no problem with it. Assuming they can demonstrate ability to use it at contact range.

Why does anyone want to take away any part of a person's ability to possibly defend themselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. There you go w/ that damned logic again
You're making the whole Air Force look bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Then I'm doing my job right.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I figured
the blue camo does a pretty good job of that .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's NOT FRIGGEN BLUE!!!!!!! (yet...)
Edited on Wed Jun-08-11 01:17 PM by PavePusher
Ha, can you tell I just gave up my beloved BDU's and capitulated to ABU's three weeks ago? Not bitter at all, noooooo......

And now the Army is going to change it's camo pattern again, alledgedly to match the USMC, but they will keep their current cloth/cut/configuration.

Who could be next? :banghead: :grr:

And yes, my BDU's will come back "out of the closet" for the last week of October. Damnit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I retired before ABUs started to be phased in
But I did wear the plain OD greens until the last day. Of course, sewing on the patches and stuff cost more than the shirt was the down side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. When I got out
My wife said "Well now you can wear your BDUs for work clothes." I replied "If i wanted to wear BDUs to work I would have re-enlisted"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. You do make a valid point ...
I carry a S&W model 642 snub nosed revolver which is often called a "belly gun."

If I were totally blind and some fool was beating the crap out of me and I feared for my life, I could shove the snubbie in his belly and pull the trigger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. A blind person may not be able to discern what is BEYOND their target.
Edited on Wed Jun-08-11 01:37 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
When you miss, bullets can go a long way. Even when you HIT your target it may continue to travel. Just because a target is at point blank range does not absolve a shooter from being responsible for what is behind a target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. No, but you can buy guns and ammo designed to minimize the possibility of overpenetration. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. If only there were some kind of invention that could be used to defend yourself at contact range...



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. A knife like that could be extremely effective at close range. (n/t)
Edited on Wed Jun-08-11 03:30 PM by spin
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Does the length of that knife
qualify as close range?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Seriously, few people realize just how deadly a large Bowie knife can be. Watch this video
on the Cold Steel Natchez Bowie ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDiU6_v_zcw

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
25.  That knife is illegal to carry,concealed or otherwise, in most states. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. It's perfectly OK for open carry in California
FWIW
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. I can carry it concealed in Florida as I have a concealed weapons permit ...
unlike many states. Florida's carry permit allows an individual to carry a variety of weapons (in Florida only).
ref: http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/news/concealed_carry.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sure, if they can meet all of the state's requirements
Including a shooting test, if applicable.

The thread will now be piled on by people who are unclear on the difference between blindness and profound blindness.

Blindness is a legal definition that qualifies a person for a tax exemption. It doesn't mean the person can't see at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. There are different degrees of legal blindness.
David Paterson, former governor of NY was legally blind, yet with the correct lighting and large enough letters he could read. He would probably have no problem identifying and seeing a close range target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Which I pointed out in the OP ...
which is why I am in favor of proving that you can safely handle a firearm on a shooting range.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. in NC
there is a range component to the CCW permit process
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. I would define competency as the ability to identify targets beyond a reasonable doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DWC Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. Physical limitations in no way
limits one's civil rights or common sense.

Semper Fi,
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PuffedMica Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. +1
Is vision a requirement to have Constitutional rights?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Tell that to one of the individuals on my Ignore list, who usually chimes in on this issue
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC