Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hamas: Haniyeh did not say he wants peace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 01:42 PM
Original message
Hamas: Haniyeh did not say he wants peace
Edited on Sun Feb-26-06 01:55 PM by barb162
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3221239,00.html

Hamas: Haniyeh did not say he wants peace



Group spokesman Salah Bardaweil says designated Palestinian PM was misquoted in Washington Post interview
Ali Waked

Hamas has denied comments attributed to its prime ministerial candidate Ismail Haniyeh. In an interview with the Washington Post, Haniyeh was quoted as saying that his organization was willing to recognize Israel if it withdraws to the June 1967 lines.


"Hamas has the full interview recorded and there is no connection to what the sheikh said to the headlines in the newspaper," said Hamas party list spokesman Dr. Salah al-Bardaweil.
snip

The Hamas spokesman disassociated his organization from the comments and said that the quotes in the newspaper were inaccurate, adding that Heniyeh said in response to a question on whether he would be willing to recognize Israel: "If Israel withdraws from the territories it conquered in '67 and if it releases all of the Palestinian prisoners and if it returns the refugees to their homes, then we will discuss it."
snip

He added that Hamas continues to be obligated to its stance to not recognize Israeli occupation and that it is unwilling to abandon the principles of the Palestinians.

(02.26.06, 17:28)








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. No partner for peace?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seems so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Negotiations must begin somewhere

If you want Hamas to negotiate peacefully, give them the tools required to do so.
Hamas needs money and international support if they are
to bring strength to the peace table.
UN observers are a must. I am for stopping ALL the violence, COMPLETELY.
Israel must allow omnipresent UN observers so that
ALL violence can be monitored and ALL transgressors punished.
This would be progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. the UN personal left.....
seems the palestenains in gaza didnt want them anymore....and the dutch in Hebron?...they too couldnt be protected by the palestenains from the palestenains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8.  "palestenains"? Are they near "iseralis"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Me thinks he needs to get his story straight
One story for the gullible American press and one story for the Arab world.

Hamas has a chance to be a legitimate government. Hopefully they will not blow it.

Arafat and Sharon were obstacles to peace simply because of who they were historically, now that is a moot point.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5.  And Abbas is singing one tune and Hamas another (or two)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Isn't this a bit misleading? It appears he didn't mention the *word* peace
but the article's title tends to make it sound as if he was against any idea of peace, when actually, it appears that he just didn't address the issue directly at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC