Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PA wants new name for Gaza, W. Bank

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 09:08 AM
Original message
PA wants new name for Gaza, W. Bank
GAZA, April 16 (UPI) -- The Palestinian Authority cabinet wants "Occupied Palestine" used when referring to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

In a decision made during the weekly meeting of the government, the Palestinian Authority instructed its representatives and media to act accordingly, the Jerusalem Post reported Thursday. Until now, the terms Palestinian Territories and West Bank and Gaza Strip were used when referring to the two areas.

Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaida and other radical Islamic groups, have always employed Occupied Palestine.

The PA said its decision came at the request of several Palestinian journalists, writers and politicians who reportedly had been urging a halt to using Israeli and Western terminology.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/04/16/PA-wants-new-name-for-Gaza-W-Bank/UPI-22631239888625/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. They can want that all they want. I doubt it will come to pass.
I can't see any of the multinational networks adopting the term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. That depends if Western goverments start
using that term networks will follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Western governments won't, though. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bert and Ernie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. personally I think
that is a good idea, and in fact the PA should also declare an independent Palestine state and use the approximate green line for their border declarations (But be careful to leave the old city as undeclared territory) That alone will generate a lot of good will for them IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. And, the UN should immediately recognize that new independent state.
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 09:43 AM by rateyes
Though, I do think they should include East Jerusalem as their capital city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm going to start using the term. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. by east jerusalem
Do you include the old city of Jerusalem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Its a good idea
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 02:09 PM by azurnoir
something I would not have thought a few months ago however I wonder if the Israeli response would not be to "lock down" or close off further all of the OPT, it would create however quite the international sh*tstorm but at the expense of the Palestinian people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm all for it, I wish them the best at having it adopted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. A marginal matter - By Gideon Levy
<snip>

"The 18th Knesset is different from all its predecessors. It is the first that does not have a Jewish MK whose guiding principle is the struggle against the occupation.

Since the 7th Knesset, the first to be elected after the Six-Day War, we have not had a parliament like this one, devoid of Jewish anti-occupation activists. As such, the new Knesset precisely reflects the popular zeitgeist, in which the occupation is completely missing from the national agenda, and there is no reason to disturb our legislators with the issue.

Nonetheless, the fact that the most pivotal issue facing our country and society does not warrant a solitary feeble voice, the fact that not even one Jewish MK, let alone one Zionist party in the Knesset, was elected to battle the occupation cannot but arouse surprise and concern. We have representatives for the environmentalists and settlers, the religious and social-welfare issues, for feminists, gays and people with disabilities. Only the occupation has been left without a voice.

There was always at least one Knesset party that raised this banner. There were always MKs who viewed this as their central issue. Now the occupation has nothing. Even the Jewish MK from Hadash waves the green flag only. Meretz has three MKs - one environmentalist, one waving the social-welfare banner, one focused on the economy. None represent the most important struggle of all. The occupation remains the domain of the marginalized Arab parties in the Knesset.

This is a shameful development for Israeli democracy, one in which 120 witnesses can attest to the Knesset's hollowness. At a time when half the world is preoccupied with the Israeli occupation, the Israeli voters make their position clear: This struggle does not interest them in the least. The occupation can wait."

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "This struggle does not interest them in the least. The occupation can wait."
And this is just another reason why Israel has no credibility when they say peace is their initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMuslim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Glad to hear it.
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 12:42 PM by ProgressiveMuslim
Nice to hear the PA including Gaza for a change.

I'm sure the Judea and Samaria crowd will love this...

Long live Filasteen!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. I generally use 'Occupied Territories' and in fact thought this was close to being an official term
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. Gaza is blockaded territory but not occupied
I didn't realize that Gaza was just Israeli and Western terminology. Guess PA will have to stop referring to Shomron, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC