Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deputize Congress..May explain a lot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 01:27 AM
Original message
Deputize Congress..May explain a lot
quote..........
An October 19 article in the San Francisco Chronicle reported that the SEC, after a period of silence, had undertaken the unprecedented action of deputizing hundreds of private officials in its investigation:

The proposed system, which would go into effect immediately, effectively deputizes hundreds, if not thousands, of key players in the private sector.
...
In a two-page statement issued to "all securities-related entities" nationwide, the SEC asked companies to designate senior personnel who appreciate "the sensitive nature" of the case and can be relied upon to "exercise appropriate discretion" as "point" people linking government investigators and the industry. 17 Â

Michael Ruppert, a former LAPD Detective, explains the consequences of this action:

What happens when you deputize someone in a national security or criminal investigation is that you make it illegal for them to disclose publicly what they know. Smart move. In effect, they become government agents and are controlled by government regulations rather than their own conscience. In fact, they can be thrown in jail without a hearing if they talk publicly. I have seen this implied threat time and again with federal investigations, intelligence agents, and even members of the United States Congress who are bound so tightly by secrecy oaths and agreements that they are not even able to disclose criminal activities inside the government for fear of incarceration. 18 Â
end quote.....

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. They made sure that nobody can find the people behind the put options
The best and most conclusive piece of evidence of large scale conspiracy are the put options, since they are undeniable given the scale of the transactions (est. 100 billion!) and peaks which were unprecedented and beyond any statistical anomaly. By deputizing everybody, the whole investigation into pre-9/11 trading was blocked, because it is bound to contain many familiar names and many of the so-called Fortune 500 who used 9/11 to extend their already immense fortune.

Mind you, the SEC itself is a 9/11 suspect since they had their offices in WTC7 and conveniently lost evidence of many serious cases like Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, etc. Instead of trying to figure out who was behind those stock options, they choose to identify all the people who could find out and deputize them. That sure reaks of a cover-up of one of the biggest crimes against humanity of this century.

The biggest problem is not so much that conspiracies happen and that it can remain secret for the population at large (because it is also clear that those willing to investigate, always find out large pieces of the puzzle, and secrecy isn't really their strong point). The biggest problem everything is set up in such a way that they always get away with everything.

It is shocking to read that Reichtag is still blamed on the communists in today's school books, despite testimony under oath at the Nürnberg Trials that Göring was running that false flag operation. So why are they protecting one of the biggest scumbags of the 20th century? The answer is easy, because if that conspiracy becomes widespread knowledge, it'll endanger present and future false flag operations. And that is why the children are taught lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They DO get away with everything
because most people can not wrap their mind around the fact that OUR gov't DID it. If they did they would have no place to turn. Americans always thought of their country as a benevolent being and to learn the truth would be too much. It is easier to live with cognitive dissonance

quote........
The phrase was also used (on page 51) in a report prepared during the war by the United States Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler's psychological profile <1>

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a BIG LIE sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it. - OSS report page 51
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

end quote.....

Is it not frightening that this is EXACTLY what Bushit & Co have done for 6 years! Think maybe Bushit's grandfather taught his this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Prescott did and he was taught by Claire Boothe Luce (Time-Life)
"Deny Everything.
There's three things to remember: claim everything, explain nothing, deny everything."
- Senator Prescott Bush

The Bush family patriarch made the above statement in a 1966 interview for Columbia University's oral history project on the Eisenhower administration. Prescott Bush said that political dictum had been explained to him by Claire Boothe Luce, congresswoman, ambassador, and wife of Time-Life media magnate Henry Luce who was also a Skull and Bones member.

Claire Boothe Luce was the ambassador in Italy who started Operation Demagnetize

Operation Demagnetize marked the institutional hardening of Operation Gladio. A State Department historian characterized it as the "strategy of stabilization, although it could be more accurately described as one of destabilization. From the start, the offensive was secretly directed and funded by the U.S. government. In 1956, the arrangement was formalized in a written agreement, using the name "Gladio for the first time. According to 1956 documents uncovered in Italy in 1990, Gladio was divided into independent cells coordinated from a CIA camp in Sardinia. These "special forces included 40 main groups. Ten specialized in sabotage, six each in espionage, propaganda, evasion and escape tactics, and 12 in guerrilla activities. Another division handled the training of agents and commandos. These "special forces had access to underground arms caches, which included hand guns, grenades, high-tech explosives, daggers, 60-millimeter mortars, 57-millimeter machine guns and precision rifles.

In 1956, Gen. Giovanni De Lorenzo was named to head SIFAR on the recommendation of U.S. Ambassador Claire Boothe Luce, the avidly anticommunist wife of the publisher of Time magazine. A key player in Gladio was now in place. In 1962, the CIA helped place De Lorenzo at the head of the national police (carabinieri), while he retained effective control of the secret service. (...)

http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/gladio.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nozebro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Would these kinds of people be more, or less likely to support a false

flag operation such as 9/11? What do you suppose that "Osama Did It" conspiracy theorists would say about this? (I'm asking NOW, because traditionally, threads like this tend to bring out the modesty and latent reticence that many of us would just as soon they exhibit more often)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Most people can't think for themselves.That's why they invented television
Or do you mean people like Prescott Bush, because their motivation is power and greed, and those people will do anything and make any deal. It is the ruthless opportunist who are the most succesful and it'll always be that group which goes to the top. People like Luce and Prescott Bush would have supported 9/11 if it could be used for their benefit. All parties involved in 9/11 have used to event for their benefit and descended upon it like vultures and invited all their friends to join in the feast. They didn't keep it quiet, everybody who had a long record of corruption could join them, because corruption is the best bond and once people have giving into corruption, it'll become and worse until they reach a point that they don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's the infamous house of cards
They know each others lie and they keep each others secrets OR the deck collapses on all of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC