A phone call on 10-26-06 to NSTB regarding flight AA77 . . .

[Klimmer]

Phone call on 10-26-06 to NTSB regarding AA77 Flight Data Recorder:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPF4Lo4wkJ4&eurl=

New 9/11 Pentagon Data released by the NSTB:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F3TvRwh1x0&mode=related&search=


Wow, imagine that. The flight line from the data flight recorder released by the NSTB doesn't match the physical evidence and the path we know that "something" took close to the ground and supposedly knocked over many light-poles. The two are in direct disagreement.

Imagine that. They can't even keep their stories straight, since they have told so many lies.

Edit: from some "other" website I'm not supposed to mention . . .

"Phone call was made 10/26/06 to the NTSB to get answers based on the Flight Data Recorder information/animation they provided of American Airlines Flight 77. AA77 was reported to have struck the Pentagon and is in direct conflict with the official story of striking down light poles on its path to impact. The actual flight path shown in the animation based on the Flight Data Recorder also conflicts with the physical damage on the ground. Here is what the NTSB had to say..."

[Klimmer]

1. C'mon people. You don't have anything to say about this? Kick.

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

2. Here, have some...

[Klimmer]

11. Mmmmm, mixed nuts! Love some. Have anything intel. to say? n/t

[mirandapriestly]

20. You thinking wanting answers is "nutty"?

For one thing, your post is a personal attack. For another, you sound like a conformist to a rather extreme degree, kind of like the "other" political party.

[patcox2]

3. Well, that proves it! It was a missile, remotely piloted by W himself.

You've got him now.

Imagine, the animation doesn't match reality. next thing you know, you're gonna tell me that Bugs Bunny isn't real.

Why do all tinfoilers say "c'mon people, don't you see it?"?

[Klimmer]

13. Why do all the OCTers . . .

make fun, ridicule, name-call etc. anyone who can demonstrate that the OCT and the actual evidence of what happened on 9-11 never match and are often diametrically opposed so often.

Can you think just a little? Or do you let Bush (the BCF and the Rethug Neo-con Admin.) do your thinking for you?

The animation is from the NSTB, and supposively made directly from flight AA77 data flight recorder. The reality of what really happened at the Pentagon, and this faked data from a phantom flight AA77 don't match at all.

Pull your head out and think for a change.

[nashville_brook]

19. 'cause it's all they got

their "software" doesn't support 911truth. they're programmed to resist, disrupt.

don't let them bring you down, 'cause as soon as they resort to ad hominem, they forfeit.

rejoice instead.

[frylock]

30. it's because they are scared to death..

it's not easy to have your shattered view of reality challenged, and this is the only they're able to deal with it. It's kind of sad, really.

[mhatrw]

26. The animation matches the Flight Data Recorder information.

So what knocked down the lamp posts?

[karlrschneider]

7. What do you want us to say? "WOW you found the SMOKING GUN!!!"?

jeezus...

[Klimmer]

14. See response #13. n/t

[mhatrw]

25. What knocked over the lamp posts?

[Nozebro]

27. It isn't clear that ANYTHING "knocked over" the lamp posts. EOM

nt

[librechik]

4. hmm--nobody but the debunkers are interested in this one.

Where are all our tinfoil hats?

I guess they're out working to GOTV.

(wish the debunkers would join them)

[Homer Wells]

12. Been looking for a good investment!

Looks like Acme Tin Foil Hat Company stock will soon go through the roof.

[Klimmer]

16. It's amazing how 9-11 truth brings out the OCTers . . .

I can't help but think that some OCTers here at DU have other motives and are not really who they say they are.

I love the DU OCTers logic. They bash Bush and call him a liar on so many issues, but when it comes to 9-11, Bush et al. are simply telling the truth and just had their pants down at the moment, got caught off-guard, and were just incompetent.

Give me a flipping break. The actual evidence says otherwise. MIHOP.

[seemslikeadream]

5. Thanks Klimmer

for the links

[Little Star]

6. Bookmarking to read later.

[byronius]

8. Interesting. I'll read it later as well.

[bigbrother05]

9. k&r

[orleans]

10. why didn't this guy, ritter, know that aa77 hit the pentagon?

looks like there are some here who post in the dungeon & get off mocking anyone who doesn't buy the oct hook, line & sinker

good luck w/this thread.

[thingfisher]

15. The same attitude

was rampant after the JFK murder as well. I know, I know, who gives a rats ass about the JFK thing?!

Well people, when you place complete trust in your government to teoll the truth about the really big things, does that mean they only lie about the little things like, Iraq?!

Wake up! The truth about 911 is the key to understanding what has happened and what is happening and what will happen in the future if we let these criminals pass off their ridiculouos official version which they know the people are eager to believe. The alternative is just to grotesque to deal with.

Open up your mind and get a copy of Webster G. Tarpley's book 911 Synthetic Terror Made in USA. Debates over planes and light poles will get us nowhere just like debates over bullets and trajectories in the JFK business. The two greatest crimes in our history wee public spectacles caught on film and meant to shock and disorient the population. The real story is in the events occurring all around the main action and the people involved.

Pardon me while I adjust my tin foil hat!!!

[Klimmer]

18. I agree with you, however . . .

both types of evidence are vitally important.

We now have loads of means, motive, opportunity evidence thanks to Ruppert, Tarpley, Thompson et al. And we now have tons of physical, factual evidence that is scientifically testable/verifiable that invalidates the OCT presented by many, many people in the 9-11 truth movement.

Both are needed, we have it, and we are gathering more and more, day by day. NGU.

[Rex]

17. Very interesting conversations.

I've always wondered why the wings didn't leave an imprint in the building structure, maybe the outside wall?

[mirandapriestly]

21. I didn't know about that contradiction

amazing how they get out of answering. The first guy was nervous and immediately wanted a way out, he knew he wasn't going to be able to answer it. NTSB was given very little access at the Pentagon, they weren't allowed in until several days later, then they were not allowed in certain places, etc... which is outrageous given that this was an airline crash of enormous significance. God , it is just so f*cking obvious that something big is being hidden and I am so mad. Why isn't everybody?

[DoYouEverWonder]

23. What blows me away

was how they let the building burn for over 24 hours.

They could have had every foam truck from three states there within a few hours and had that building out completely. They almost acted as if there weren't any casualties, or they already knew all the casualties were dead?

[mirandapriestly]

28. Yes, the story is very weird

I think they wanted to make sure certain people were gone and maybe certain things.

[Klimmer]

22. Here is more from the "Pilots for 9-11 Truth" website . . .

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html

Very interesting.

[Name removed]

24. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[philb]

29. Suggesting people with no guns took over 4 airliners is ludicrous

The pilots have communications links to the flight attendents who would have warned the pilots,
who were behind locked doors. Even if the alleged hijackers were provided keys, they couldn't
take over the plane even if they got through the door, and certainly not without the pilots pressing a button or calling to mayday the situation. The pilots could disable them by
maneuving the plane anytime they wanted to. Experienced pilots polled say the official story was not likely in even one plane, but certainly not in 4, and not in the last 2 that knew about the earlier events.

[Twist_U_Up]

31. "They can't even keep their stories straight, since they have told so many lies."

Tru dat, This whole thing is sickening. What are they hiding ?