|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 01:10 PM Original message |
Back to the towers.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salvorhardin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. Translation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertypirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
50. May I translate you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoping4Change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 02:59 PM Response to Reply #50 |
89. Well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:44 AM Response to Reply #50 |
109. quickesst did not claim to be an expert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. The official explanation for the collapse of the towers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 02:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Smart asses? I think you mean dumb asses.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. You do not have the NIST final version |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 02:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. MirandaPriestly and DoYouEverWonder.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 08:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. I'm sorry if this is persnickety, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 09:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. IOW what the debunker's do all the time.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 09:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. And this is what YOU seem to do all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 10:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 10:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. It is true that you always misuse the term straw man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boastOne43 (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 12:18 AM Response to Reply #4 |
31. sorry but the NIST report has already been proven inadequate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 02:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
35. Consider..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 12:50 AM Response to Reply #35 |
56. Excellent points all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 03:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
76. Oops! Forgot To Explain Free Fall-Can't Be True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
5. So are you saying that heat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 08:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
64. "Conduct" is the right word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 11:47 AM Response to Reply #64 |
71. Thank you, it is fun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 08:07 AM Response to Reply #71 |
111. I don't quite understand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 09:50 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Oh, I mean, I don't get your definition of radiation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 07:36 PM Response to Reply #113 |
130. You're not the only one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 07:47 PM Response to Reply #113 |
131. This might be helpful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Hello! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. This seems to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
57. Oh so that was what those pancakes are for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. how did the steel ten floors above the crash site collapse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 10:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. That's an assumtion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemInDistress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
41. rotflmfaooooooooooooooo..... what your eyes see the mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well, you know, the steel in WTC was special, it was more like tin foil ;) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 05:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. That's another thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 05:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Hey, quickesst, what do you make of this close up vid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 09:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I always thought the flashes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 09:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Um, this is a discussion about acoustic guitars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 10:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. I don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 10:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Your link goes to a forum where they are discussing acoustic guitars :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 02:19 AM Response to Reply #25 |
36. How embarrassing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. That Landmark Tower demolition is a pretty good example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 12:27 AM Response to Reply #42 |
51. Here is an uncut version, Sinti, from an aerial view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #51 |
98. You're right, the Landmark Towers and WTC looking nothing alike. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 12:35 AM Response to Reply #98 |
103. You can see that they are both controlled demolitions, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 12:53 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. The problem here is that controlled demolitions are just that, controlled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 02:23 AM Response to Reply #105 |
107. Here are a few |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 03:29 AM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Sinti, agreed that it seems that there are no videos of the bottom of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:47 AM Response to Reply #108 |
144. the fact that it fell quickly and somewhat uniformly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 01:31 AM Response to Reply #103 |
106. Let's try a little Logic 101... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:45 AM Response to Reply #106 |
110. Logic will get you nowhere in these parts of DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 09:53 AM Response to Reply #110 |
114. That is why you have posted here daily for 3 + years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:40 PM Response to Reply #114 |
121. I have no clue what you are talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 09:59 AM Response to Reply #103 |
115. I can see you are still responsing to my posts, Jazz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:42 PM Response to Reply #115 |
125. And I can see you are still telling tales |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 07:14 PM Response to Reply #115 |
128. I can't read your posts which leads me to the conclusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 12:53 AM Response to Reply #128 |
174. You should lay off the shellfish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:20 AM Response to Reply #103 |
135. I have found a video with a more full view of WTC 7. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:31 AM Response to Reply #135 |
142. Glad you asked that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 10:21 PM Response to Reply #142 |
207. WTC 6 got owned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 02:45 AM Response to Reply #207 |
208. uh-huh.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 12:49 PM Response to Reply #135 |
214. The Penthouse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 12:39 AM Response to Reply #42 |
54. That naughty kitty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 11:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. To answer your question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #30 |
55. "how can just a few explosives bring a building down?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 12:54 PM Response to Reply #55 |
215. Potential energy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
157. To RE Answer It Correctly - Explosives Built In, Encapsulated In Concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 11:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. I didn't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. As I'm waiting for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:08 AM Response to Reply #16 |
134. The WTC towers were not, by any means, glorified erector set. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 01:04 AM Response to Reply #16 |
138. Ludicrous To Attribute Entire Buildings Fall To Sand, Gravel & Steel FRAGS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. Excellent points quickesst! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 10:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. This is what I mean by straw man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 10:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Debunking, are you suggesting that there was fire on nearly all floors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 11:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. What makes you think you need all floors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-10-06 11:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. It is the speed of the collapse that bothers me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 12:20 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. There was NO reinforced concrete core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 12:28 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Actually I'm not referring to his site. These are the refs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:58 AM Response to Reply #32 |
137. I Explained Free Fall Because Concrete Can Fracture And Fall, You Have No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-18-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
169. The Towers Fell Uniformly. No Fire On A Floor, No Failure, Not Uniform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
34. quickesst & wildbilln864 Thank you for your informed observations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 06:06 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Straw men... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Please don't put words in my mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. molten steel/iron... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 02:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. This was explained by physics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:26 PM Response to Reply #43 |
156. Calcs. Correct But Energy Not Focused Enough To Melt Steel. Forget it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #39 |
211. Thermite would NOT keep steel molten for weeks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chomp (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 10:59 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Nobody says the buldings fell as the result of fire alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 02:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Nobody says everyone in MIHOP say it was the fires alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 06:18 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Deleted message |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. I didn't blame you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Bunk, in the realtime TV news reports, FDNY and police |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:08 AM Response to Reply #53 |
58. It's not unusual at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:31 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. The term was "secondary explosion" which is a term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:16 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Not so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:54 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Google "secondary explosion". It always has a specific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 03:04 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-14-06 07:30 PM Response to Reply #60 |
92. These sure look like secondary explosions to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:42 AM Response to Reply #92 |
212. A secondary explosion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 08:45 AM Response to Reply #53 |
65. Pet, Some people heard the explosive sound of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 11:36 AM Response to Reply #65 |
88. Please provide a quote from a specific person who described |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-14-06 12:26 AM Response to Reply #65 |
91. Please be a little more considerate of other people's experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-18-06 02:36 PM Response to Reply #65 |
170. Men 6 Floors Down In the Basement Found Exploded Walls, From Plane Impact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 07:36 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Debunking911, why did the steel at the core offer so little resistance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:11 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. The core didn't fail first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 09:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. I didn't ask when the core failed I asked why didn't it slow the collapse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 09:03 AM Response to Reply #49 |
66. The floors are not ON TOP OF THE CORE so why should it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #66 |
70. My question is not a "straw man" - a straw man is a very specific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 11:59 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. A second question: if the floors peeled so easily away from the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. BTW, there were more than just 5/8 inch bolts holding the steel together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Good find! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 03:11 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. Wowsers! ,nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grateful for Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 04:03 PM Response to Reply #74 |
80. Excellent find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 01:15 AM Response to Reply #48 |
139. NOTICE: No Raw Images Used, Paints Mental Picture (argument demo inside) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 03:10 PM Response to Reply #44 |
77. NO MIHOP says "Fires Alone", Unless Disinfo, Planted Strawman In Truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 12:31 AM Response to Reply #38 |
52. Those drawings are what's dishonest about the NIST report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 06:44 AM Response to Reply #52 |
63. Well said petgoat.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 09:38 AM Response to Reply #63 |
68. Why is it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrgerbik (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 10:07 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. because ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #52 |
67. Jones blob photo are photoshopped, Pyroclastic flow never happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 11:57 AM Response to Reply #67 |
72. Boy are you jumping to conclusions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 05:15 PM Response to Reply #72 |
82. That's because hes been changing his paper... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 11:31 AM Response to Reply #82 |
87. I don't believe that Jim Hoffman ever claimed that the dust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 09:55 PM Response to Reply #87 |
100. Actually Hoffman claimed something even more ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boastOne43 (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 04:13 PM Response to Reply #67 |
81. that photo actually exhibits signs of thermite use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 05:29 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 03:14 PM Response to Reply #52 |
79. Thermite also provides oxygen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 05:36 PM Response to Reply #79 |
84. You can't find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 02:10 AM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Uh, thermite is just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 11:49 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. I don't recall saying thermite blew up like a bomb? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 04:22 AM Response to Reply #90 |
93. from your site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
simonm (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 01:11 AM Response to Reply #38 |
85. elevator shafts - most likely place for bombs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #85 |
94. The plan itself is unlikely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 11:50 AM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Once again, your post is full of invented impediments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 03:35 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. Here is my evidence, now show me yours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 04:09 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 10:33 PM Response to Reply #97 |
101. Re: elevator shaft doorways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #101 |
116. Dr. Van Romero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 07:05 PM Response to Reply #116 |
127. I've seen that quote many times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:18 AM Response to Reply #127 |
140. That's what the paraphrase says. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 12:19 AM Response to Reply #97 |
102. And another query, petgoat., re: access to elevator shafts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 10:49 AM Response to Reply #102 |
117. For Elevator Access see "Elevator Surfing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:52 AM Response to Reply #117 |
136. I doubt that "elevator surfing" as described |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:22 AM Response to Reply #136 |
141. practically impossible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 08:01 PM Response to Reply #141 |
161. You seem to be taking a very simplistic view to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 12:48 AM Response to Reply #161 |
173. You don't source your claims of detailed technical knowledge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 01:18 AM Response to Reply #173 |
175. Again, Ms. Goat, your simplistic view is apparent in your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #175 |
177. Still no source, I see. I don't see how you can claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:05 AM Response to Reply #177 |
179. There you go again, Ms. Goat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:20 AM Response to Reply #179 |
180. Your response in detail was unsourced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:22 AM Response to Reply #180 |
182. Nah, you didn't address my points because you can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:32 AM Response to Reply #182 |
184. Still no source, I see. Spam does not serve truth, nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:37 AM Response to Reply #184 |
185. Lame, lame, lame, Ms. Goat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:40 AM Response to Reply #185 |
186. Surely as a lawyer you understand that much of your stuff is inadmissible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 03:30 AM Response to Reply #186 |
189. It seems that you can't even spell inadmissible, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:21 AM Response to Reply #189 |
192. Your detailed responses were unsourced, and thus bs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:34 AM Response to Reply #192 |
195. Yet again, Ms. Goat, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:35 AM Response to Reply #195 |
196. Still no source, only spam. My point was important, I suppose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:45 AM Response to Reply #196 |
198. Still no refutation, only nonsense, Ms. Goat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:46 AM Response to Reply #198 |
199. Your stuff is not sourced, therefore inadmissible. That's nonsense? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:51 AM Response to Reply #199 |
201. Your responses are the nonsensical bits, Ms. Goat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:55 AM Response to Reply #201 |
202. Restate your points (if any) . I'm beginning to think my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 11:01 AM Response to Reply #97 |
118. I asked for evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:41 AM Response to Reply #118 |
143. You asked for evidence and you got it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 07:41 AM Response to Reply #143 |
146. Laminar flow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:28 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. Laminar flow as opposed to turbulent flow is a simple intuitive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 09:47 PM Response to Reply #147 |
162. A PhD in fluid mechanics is not necessary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-18-06 01:45 PM Response to Reply #162 |
168. It's not my theory, it's Bunk's theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-15-06 09:40 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. Re: Alleged risk of radio control. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 05:08 PM Response to Reply #99 |
206. Hey, petgoat, they didn't really have to do radio control, if the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 12:46 AM Response to Reply #85 |
104. simonm, re: access to elevator shafts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 09:22 AM Response to Reply #104 |
112. They wear uniforms. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 01:14 PM Response to Reply #112 |
119. So can Al Qeada |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. You're catching on. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:25 PM Response to Reply #120 |
123. Unfortunately you don't seem to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 09:59 PM Response to Reply #123 |
133. Let's just say they know their way around uniforms. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #133 |
148. You can say it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 05:47 PM Response to Reply #104 |
122. Since BushCo member Marvin Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:29 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. He was out by 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 06:45 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. He could have easily made sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 07:18 PM Response to Reply #126 |
129. That's not evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-16-06 07:49 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Who said it was evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:56 PM Response to Reply #132 |
151. The information IS what's called HISTORICAL evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #151 |
154. Nobody needs training in elevator mechanics to place some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-18-06 05:31 AM Response to Reply #154 |
164. Our friend is all about red herrings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:57 AM Response to Reply #104 |
145. Security never sleeps? I guess you've never been a guard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:45 PM Response to Reply #145 |
149. Thermite burns down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. I'm no expert on thermite, and prefer not to speculate on how it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #150 |
152. Once again that's not true at all.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 01:17 PM Response to Reply #152 |
153. "Quote where the NIST ever said it was a few clips" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 03:12 PM Response to Reply #153 |
158. In other words you have no evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 03:46 PM Response to Reply #158 |
159. I have no evidence that your faulty framing is true, correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-18-06 08:32 AM Response to Reply #159 |
165. You didn't say "zipper theory". But NIST never said zipper theory anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-18-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #165 |
167. I never said NIST said "zipper theory". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 09:44 AM Response to Reply #167 |
209. FEMA didn't mention "Zipper" either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:57 AM Response to Reply #150 |
213. Small amounts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #149 |
155. Thermite Placed During 1993 Bomb Remodel - Intimate Contact W/Steel Allows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indigolake (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 05:42 PM Response to Reply #155 |
160. Remodeling and rebuilding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-17-06 10:06 PM Response to Reply #160 |
163. "where the Consti...*what* resides?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-18-06 08:52 AM Response to Reply #163 |
166. That's just not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-18-06 03:39 PM Response to Reply #166 |
171. The elevators.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 12:24 AM Response to Reply #171 |
172. Thanks for your expertise, quickesst. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 01:33 AM Response to Reply #171 |
176. quickesst - that's a nice little anecdote but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 01:48 AM Response to Reply #176 |
178. "subject to being summoned to other floors" At 3:00 a.m.? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:21 AM Response to Reply #178 |
181. Ms. Goat, your simplistic view and your ignorance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:29 AM Response to Reply #181 |
183. I am suggesting nothing of the sort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 02:56 AM Response to Reply #183 |
187. Once again illustrating your lack of knowledge, Ms. Goat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 03:03 AM Response to Reply #187 |
188. Au Contraire, Master Jazz. (pat pat pat on head) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 03:48 AM Response to Reply #188 |
190. You haven't a clue about what you're talking about, clearly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:18 AM Response to Reply #190 |
191. One could simply avoid the floors of the very busy law firm where the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:26 AM Response to Reply #191 |
193. Seems you're hopeless, Ms. Goat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:28 AM Response to Reply #193 |
194. Unsourced points are not worth even reading, let alone addressing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:43 AM Response to Reply #194 |
197. Nah, you just can't refute them so you're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:50 AM Response to Reply #197 |
200. Restate your points (if any) and I'll respond. I've restated mine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 07:07 AM Response to Reply #190 |
203. In buildings like the WTC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #203 |
204. "lots of places to hide" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debunking911 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 09:55 AM Response to Reply #204 |
210. There is a difference between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 04:25 PM Response to Reply #166 |
205. well, yeah obviously - I agree it's not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC