Another take on SInclair.

[Perky]

I confess I don't know what the end result of all the anger about Sinclair will be.


I fear however, that should the FCC/FEC decline to intervene that they are going to air the fool thing. WHich virtually no one is going to watch except those who are pro * anyway.

Is it wise to stir this pot...making it all that more controversial and thus increasing the number of viewers.

Why give the enamy free publicity?

[sandnsea]

1. Well hell yes

If corporations manipulating Presidential elections isn't worth getting in a stir over, what the hell is? I wish we'd add that this explodes the myth of the liberal media, once and for all.

[seabeyond]

2. i agree the people arent going to be watching

and all this is old stuff that has been debunked. i do think this is good for a handful of reasons. sinclair ahs abused their poer in other ways adn we have allowed. otehr companies, murdoch and cnn are getting away with it too. what i really like is the democrats are yelling loud and we dont normally do that. i dont boycott because i dont like hurting a business ergo employees but told business's this is my kids future and as much as i dont like hurting them, this is a greater cause

it is making a visual how are media is abusing their power with the most obvious company

it is empowering democrats

the momentum and power is with us