Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It’s not just Al Qaqaa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 03:10 PM
Original message
It’s not just Al Qaqaa

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?section=Opinion&OID=62482

It’s not just Al Qaqaa

By PAUL KRUGMAN

Al Qaqaa illustrates graphically the failures of Mr. Bush’s national security leadership. But it is hardly the only tale of incompetence and mendacity to break to the surface lately.

Just in case, the Right is already explaining away President Bush’s defeat: it’s all the fault of the “liberal media,” particularly The New York Times, which, so the conspiracy theory goes, deliberately timed its report on the looted Al Qaqaa explosives—a report all the more dastardly because it was true—for the week before the election.

It’s remarkable that the right-wingers who dominate cable news and talk radio are still complaining about a liberal stranglehold over the media. But, that absurdity aside, they’re missing a crucial point: Al Qaqaa is hardly the only tale of incompetence and mendacity to break to the surface in the last few days. Here’s a quick look at some of the others:

• Letting Osama get away. Just before the story about Al Qaqaa broke, the Bush-Cheney campaign was frantically trying to debunk John Kerry’s statement that Mr. Bush let Osama bin Laden get away when he was cornered at Tora Bora. That getaway, Mr. Kerry asserts, was possible because the administration “outsourced” the job of closing off escape routes to local Afghan warlords.

In response, Gen. Tommy Franks claimed that we don’t know that Osama was at Tora Bora, and, anyway, we didn’t outsource the work of catching him. Dick Cheney called Mr. Kerry's claims “absolute garbage.” But multiple reports from 2001 and early 2002 confirm Mr. Kerry’s version. As Peter Bergen, a terrorism expert, writes, Mr. Kerry’s charge is “an accurate reflection of the historical record.”

• Letting Zarqawi get away. On Monday The Wall Street Journal confirmed an earlier report that in 2002 the military drew up plans for a strike on the base of the terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in an area of Iraq not under Saddam’s control. But civilian officials vetoed the attack—probably because they thought it might undermine political support for the war against Saddam. So Mr. Zarqawi, like Osama, was given the chance to kill another day.

• The situation in Iraq. Dick Cheney is telling supporters that Iraq is a “remarkable success story.” But the news from Iraq just keeps getting worse. After 49 Iraqi National Guard recruits were killed, execution-style, even Ayad Allawi, the Iraqi prime minister—who usually acts as a de facto spokesman for the Bush-Cheney campaign—accused coalition forces of “gross negligence.” It’s now clear that the insurgency is much larger than US officials initially acknowledged, and that Iraqi security forces have been heavily infiltrated.

• $70 billion more. Earlier this week The Washington Post reported that administration officials were planning to seek an additional $70 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan after the election.

Whatever the precise number, it has long been obvious to knowledgeable observers that this was coming, but the news will come as a shock to many people who still don’t realize how deep a quagmire Mr. Bush has gotten us into.

All of these stories would be getting more play right now if it weren’t for the Al Qaqaa mess. Still, one can understand why the Right is so upset.

After all, Al Qaqaa illustrates in a particularly graphic way the failures of Mr. Bush’s national security leadership. US soldiers passed through Al Qaqaa, a crucial munitions dump, but were never told that it was important to secure the site. If administration officials object that they couldn’t have spared enough troops to guard the site, they’re admitting that they went in without enough troops. And the fact that these explosives fell into unknown hands is a perfect example of how the Iraq war has worsened the terrorist threat.

The story of Al Qaqaa has brought out the worst in a campaign dedicated to the proposition that the President is infallible—and that it’s always someone else’s fault when things go wrong. Here’s what Rudy Giuliani said on Thursday: “No matter how you try to blame it on the President, the actual responsibility for it really would be for the troops that were there.

Did they search carefully enough?” Support the troops!

But worst of all from the Right’s point of view, Al Qaqaa has disrupted the campaign’s media strategy. Karl Rove clearly planned to turn the final days of the campaign into a series of “global test” moments—taking something Mr. Kerry said and distorting its meaning, then generating pseudo-controversies that dominate the airwaves. Instead, the news media have spent the last few days discussing substance. And that’s very bad news for Mr. Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Village Idiot
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.

Thank you.

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shelley806 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent!!!
Go Paul Krugman!!!

TU for the full post, even if it was against rule of 4 paragraphs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. The more the merrier
WOOHOO!! Bush sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. and the nuclear sites
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/14/iraq.nuclear.reut/index.html

VIENNA, Austria (Reuters) -- The mysterious removal of Iraq's mothballed nuclear facilities continued long after the U.S.-led invasion and was carried out by people with access to heavy machinery and demolition equipment, diplomats said on Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC