Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry in Iowa Boosted by Vietnam Past

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:41 PM
Original message
Kerry in Iowa Boosted by Vietnam Past
John Kerry, playing heavily to veterans, war and foreign policy issues, was boosted on Saturday by a man whose life he saved in Vietnam 35 years ago as Iowa's hotly contested Democratic presidential caucuses neared.

Kerry's campaign said the former Green Beret, whom he pulled from the BayHap River in 1969 in an act that won him the Bronze Star, would be reunited with the Massachusetts senator later in the day for the first time since the rescue and the two would campaign together. The announcement said that Kerry, who returned from that war as activist opponent to it, had not been touch with him but that the man contacted his campaign headquarters on Friday and volunteered to help.

<snip>

At least one man in the crowd told Kerry his answers had brought him into his camp.

"Is John Kerry different? How do I know I can trust him, not just the words of a campaign? What you need to do is look at the totality of my experience in life," he said. He spoke at length of health care problems facing veterans in response to a woman who said her husband was totally disabled as a result of the Vietnam War, and said Veterans should be given an interchangeable "gold card" that would allow then to receive treatment at any medical facility.

He continued to attack President Bush over the Iraq war, saying his actions had isolated the country from the world community. "This administration is leading America in a radically wrong direction ... and the one person who deserves to be laid off is George Bush," he said. His own Senate vote for the measure that ultimately led to the war, he said, was not a matter of voting for war but for a process in which war was to have been only the last resort.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=4152540


I had to post this because, finally, a sound-bite sized answer from Kerry on why he voted for the IWR. "not a matter of voting for war but for a process in which war was to have been only the last resort" expresses perfectly what I spent two hours explaining in an email to a friend the other day. Well I guess that's one reason I'm not running for President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry is a great man...
& it makes me sick that these holier than thou (I won't vote for anyone who voted for the war), they voted on what information they were given at the time & what had just happened to America. I don't fault them for any of it I fault the Fucking liar Bush & until some people witout a clue figure that out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's a laugh
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 05:53 PM by wtmusic
What process was it that Kerry voted for? Kerry voted to abdicate the constitutional responsibility to provide a check to the power of the executive branch.

That process would have prevented the war whether the president was lying or not.

BTW, is Kerry for or against the war today?

Whatever way the wind blows... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What garbage!
"Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to `work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge' posed by Iraq and to `work for the necessary resolutions,' while also making clear that `the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable';"

This pretty much sums up the war resoulution. "while also making clear that `the Security Council resolutions" Congress had no control over Bush not doing what was in the resolution!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There is no security council resolution
that authorizes going to war unilaterally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thats my point!
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 06:02 PM by Democrats unite
There wasn't one and Congress authorized Bush to follow U.N. Security resolutions. So how is this the fault of those in Congress?

On edit: If you read the resolution from Congress you will see that they gave Bush strick guidelins that he didn't follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. A bus could drive through
the holes in that resolution.

How about 'the just demands of peace and security' being met?

Does Kerry support the war now? I have yet to hear a straight answer out of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well if we had a Democratic Congress...
You have to work with what you have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just witnessed this reunion
of Kerry & the man who's life he saved in 1969. It was very touching, they hadn't seen each other since Vietnam. This man was a Green Beret, & he's a Republican, but he said he's voting for Kerry because he tells you the truth & you can trust him.

I am a Clark supporter, but I admire John Kerry very much. I will work for Clark, but if Kerry wins the nomination, I will support him in a heartbeat.

For several days Kerry's campaign ran some stuff against Clark, which I was not happy with. However, I don't think he was comfortable with it, because he always said Clark was his friend &Clark was a good man.

Anyway, this reunion was wonderful & touched me very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. it was very emotional
John Kerry did a great job keeping it together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC