Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

People Fired Due to Blogs: New Policies Needed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Enquiringkitty Donating Member (721 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:19 PM
Original message
People Fired Due to Blogs: New Policies Needed
Sunday, March 6, 2005 Posted: 2:05 PM EST (1905 GMT)

NEW YORK (AP) -- Flight attendant Ellen Simonetti and former Google employee Mark Jen have more in common than their love of blogging: They both got fired over it.

Simonetti had posted suggestive photographs of herself in uniform, while Jen speculated online about his employer's finances. In neither case were their bosses happy when they found out.

Though many companies have Internet guidelines that prohibit visiting porn sites or forwarding racist jokes, few of the policies directly cover blogs, or Web journals, particularly those written outside of work hours.

"There needs to be a dialogue going on between employers and employees," said Heather Armstrong, a Web designer fired for commenting on her blog about goings on at work. "There's this power of personal publishing, and there needs to be rules about what you can or cannot say about the workplace."

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/internet/03/06/firedforblogging.ap/index.html

Do you think employers have the right to fire an employee due to his/her blogging habits? Do you think it is discrimination or in any way against the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting also, that the flight attendent has a Cost of Iraq War
calculator on her blog page.

I'm just saying... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not blogging, it's "employment at will". . .
that's the true evil in the house. Address the cause, not the symptom, and the symptom becomes a memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll bet it was the uniform.
...Simonetti had posted suggestive photographs of herself in uniform...

That's a no-no. It is not just personal; it involves the company image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Depends
Were they blogging at work? If they are doing it on their own time, I wouldn't think the employer had a leg to stand on. But if they are supposed to be working and blogging instead, then the employer might have just cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. unfortunately, most of us have to sign
non-disclosure agreements, so speculation about an employer's finances might legally fall under that heading. I don't agree with him being fired, but he might be on legally shakey ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I thought about that too
I work for a school district and they sure frown upon us talking to the media about our dirty laundry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enquiringkitty Donating Member (721 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Most companies have gotten away with a policy of making you
choose between your ethic, or values, or any other view and having a job with them. It's a way of bring you in line with the way they want you to think. After a while, they think you won't "bite the hand that feeds you". A good way of keeping you quiet while they do "business as usual".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Posting "uniform babe" photos is a good way to get fired
So is speculating about your company's finances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC