Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was ANWR sadistically sweet for Chimp, b/c was able to beat Kerry again?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 12:38 AM
Original message
Was ANWR sadistically sweet for Chimp, b/c was able to beat Kerry again?
ANWR has been a pet issue for Kerry for years. Yesterday Kerry used his mailing list to ask for signatures to stop the drilling.

Chimp is a sadistic egomanical, insecure little man. He nearly smirked himself to death when the election returns came in.

Of course chimp wants all of his destructive evil policies to go thru, but I suspect drilling in ANWR had a particular perverse pleasure for *. He got to kick Kerry again, stick his tongue out at him (tardive diskinesia?) and twist the knife. He got to gut Kerry's pet issue.

Am I just reading pettiness and sadism into smirk, or did he really get a jolt out of ANWR just because it was Kerry's baby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mark my words, not a drop of oil will ever come out of ANWR
we might of lost the first battle by a hair but there are many more to come. Remember the Alaskan pipeline was held up for almost ten years by environmentalist lawsuits, I expect this one to be no different.
Anyways the budget bill needs to pass for ANWR to pass, something that hasn't happened in two years of trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I agree
On another thread someone posted an article where even oil companies were against the drilling there. So if they are against it (I think Texaco was listed) I think you're right with that (the orginial poster). Just like brining Elliot Abrhams back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. That was probably at least a bonus for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fuck that, Kerry is doing what he needs to do lead the democrats
...in the senate to call theses bastards on every backtracking, harmful piece of legislation they try to ram through for their wealth pals. The democrats have a mandate from 53 million voters and that's political capital also. Any who choose to squander that and ignore the needs of the constituents who put them there needs to get a good thrashing from the democratic voters.

As for Bush and his republicans thugs, their days are numbered because the whole country is watching and getting wise to what they really represent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hey, whistle, nice to see something positive from you!
I like your posts, and it's nice to see an optimistic view of the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thanks Babylonsister, I have my up days as well as my down
...days. I'm still on that emotional roller coaster from the election and what followed and find it hard to discern much as positive from the political actions I see taking place. But I have made a decision to make a conscious effort to seek out good and try to be optimistic and hopeful about the future. Thanks again for your validation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I think that
with the republicans they are definietly high on power and they don't care people are watching. Especially Bush and his camp. They know they won't be running again so nobody in them has to care what people think. That's why Bush doesn't ever use his fake Texas accent or his good ol boy attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sadism just comes naturally to the chimp. It doesn't particularly matter
who the object is. When he was kid, it was his brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Guy Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. What do you mean kick Kerry again?
Edited on Thu Mar-17-05 01:28 AM by Generic Guy
Kerry won the election. Diebold and right wing nutjobs stole the election for bush.:-(

Besides this is far from over there will be no drilling just wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. He beat Kerry by 2 votes, not 20.
If anything, the ANWR vote reinforces Bush's lack of a mandate.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. We're not beat yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bush does seem to like making issues personal ...
I think you're onto something there, NAO. My theory about why he was so adamant about removing the US's signature from the Kyoto Protocol was because the agreement was put together by Al Gore -- Bush doesn't want to give Gore a scrap of credit. The usual thing is just to refuse to ratify, and that way you can have it both ways (pretend you're still supporting the idea for the environmentalists, but reassure industry that you're not going to actually do anything).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC