Freeh Fooled

[Vyan]

This Sunday on 60 Minutes Former FBI Director Louis Freeh has blasted the Clinton Whitehouse as being "Soft" on Terrorism, but are his charges legitimate or was the Former Director and far from closeted Republican in fact being fooled by the Saudis on the Khobar incident?

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/10/11/13928/060

[knowbody0]

1. not knowing what you don't know

ha!

[FreedomAngel82]

2. One must think

it's a ploy from Rummy.

[aquart]

3. That was pleasant. Louis Freeh is a piece of work.

He's right up there with Dick Morris in Clinton errors.

[AtomicKitten]

4. Freeh is a tool.

[mainer]

5. So Freeh's source is ... Prince Bandar?

The same guy he's accusing of hiding the truth? Whuh?

[librechik]

8. exactly

none of this passes the smell test. Egregiously CYA in nature.

From the Kos story:

"The most interesting thing about this scenario besides Freeh's claim that he only received help from former President Bush, who was well known as a close friend of the Saudi Royal Family, is the fact that he refused to have the indictments served for those reponsible for the attack until after President Clinton left office - almost 5 years after the attack. Exactly who was dragging their feet on what here?..."

[McCamy Taylor]

6. Great story from Daily Kos. A must read. Freeh needs to retire to the

shadows before what is left of his miserable reputation is shattered.

For those who havent seen it, here is my illustrated take on Mr. Freeh's tenure as FBI head. This man is a bundle of insecurities.

http://www.grandtheftelectionohio.com/051010.htm

[liberalitch]

7. Hmmmmm, Slimey.....

I wonder what the Big Dawg has to say?