|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 05:56 PM Original message |
OK, so both are perjuries. But there is a difference between lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. Do we know that the charge will be perjury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivejazz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Are both really perjuries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Well, it had tangental bearing in a civil suit about bad behavior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tulsakatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 06:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. excellent point!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 07:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. And that is why he was never charged with Perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. Clinton PERJURY CONVICTION NEVER HAPPENED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 07:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Besides, as those who remember Watergate know, it's not the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well, of course there is. But remember, freepers are not known |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 07:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. And that pretty much sums them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-26-05 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. I've heard two reasons why the Clinton testimony was not perjury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 06:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. true - that is why "misleading the court" contempt and a fine were the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
12. No. One is about treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC