Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military Investigating Payments To Iraqi Press To Produce Happy News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 12:03 PM
Original message
Military Investigating Payments To Iraqi Press To Produce Happy News
The U.S. military is investigating allegations that the American military is buying positive coverage in the Iraqi media is examining a press club founded and financed by the U.S. Army.

The ever-expanding investigation into U.S. propaganda efforts is being headed by Rear Adm. Scott Van Buskirk. He will look into whether there were efforts to place U.S.-produced stories into the local press without identifying the United States as the source. Paying reporters directly to write positive stories might also violate ethical guidelines.

If true, it doesn't say much for U.S. credibility as a purveyor of democracy, given that one of our nation's founding principles is a free press.

***

The Baghdad Press Club was created last year by the U.S. military as a way to promote progress amid the violence and chaos of Iraq, said Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, a military spokesman.

The Army acknowledges funding the club and offering "reporter compensation," but insists officers did not demand favorable coverage. "Members are not required nor asked to write favorably," said Lt. Col. Robert Whetstone. "They are simply invited to report on events."

To JABBS' ears, that spin sounds all too familiar.

It's a similar concept to what President Bush said in March, defending the administration's use of undocumented video news releases -- something the non-partisan General Accountability Office labeled "covert propaganda."

BUSH: "There is a Justice Department opinion that says these pieces are OK so long as they're based upon facts, not advocacy. And I expect our agencies to adhere to that ruling."

Amazingly, Bush was suggesting that propaganda created by the government was not "advocacy" -- as if his administration would pay a journalist or create a video news release to oppose the administration.

Similarly, it's hard to believe the Army would pay Iraqi journalists to write "negative" stories about the U.S.-led effort in Iraq.

But, according to Iraqi reporters, the Army is paying Iraqi reporters to avoid actual war coverage and focus on "good news" stories, such as restored sewage plants and newly-opened schools.

Baghdad Press Club members -- 25 to 30 freelance reporters and staff employees for television stations and newspapers -- were paid about $25 for each story and $45 if the piece ran with photos. Television reporters were paid $50 for pieces. That's a handsome amount of money, given that the average Iraqi earns less than $300 per month.

***

The Army spin is also hard to believe because it comes on the heels of an investigation concluded this month by the Los Angeles Times, which obtained documents revealing that the Pentagon is secretly paying Iraqi newspapers to publish dozens of "good news" stories, written by American troops.

The articles are translated into Arabic and placed in Baghdad newspapers with the help of a Washington-based defense contractor, Lincoln Group. Many are falsely presented in the Iraqi press as unbiased news accounts written and reported by independent journalists -- such as in Al Mutamar, a Baghdad-based daily owned by friends of Bush Administration ally Ahmed Chalabi.

Van Buskirk is also examining the evidence obtained by the Times.

***

This item first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. This seems to be a Bush specialty. Allow the perpetrators to
investigate themselves. I'm sure we will get an accurate, unbiased report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. isn't it uncanny
how the army guy and Bush each offered the same lame excuse about propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Judged Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. When one does LSD do they see facts? If not, then how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Judged Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "OK so long as they're based upon facts, not advocacy."
excerpt from your post:

"BUSH: "There is a Justice Department opinion that says these pieces are OK so long as they're based upon facts, not advocacy. And I expect our agencies to adhere to that ruling.""
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. that's my point
It's ridiculous to think that the WH would pay a journalist to write something anti-Bush. Similarly, it's ridiculous to think that the Army would pay an Iraqi journalist to write something anti-U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC