Well, even the Senior Editor Ryan Lizza of the New Republic on

[frankly_fedup2]

CSPAN this morning feels that Cindy should not have been at the SOTU or wore the T-shirt. He stated he agreed to a certain extent with Rich Lowry, Senior Editor the National Review, I don't think he agreed to the remarks that Rich Lowry made calling her a "SPECTACLE." Lizza really didn't go into detail, but he sure did not support her being there, and didn't verbally support her in any way.

I don't understand, like Pitt stated yesterday, she is the only one out there with a name that matches a face that has the nerve to get out there and tell them how she feels.

These Republicans call her a names and then after they almost crucify the woman, of course, they are sorry she lost her son. However, she is against the troops. How stupid can people be!!!!

[fujiyama]

1. The TNR is somewhat right of center

Remember, it endorsed Lieberman for God's sakes.

[Cassandra]

2. This is C-Span's idea of balance

sigh!

[ScreamingMeemie]

3. So many are willing to "talk"...yet few will "walk"...even here.

We scream and yell that no one is listening then, when somebody attempts to be heard, we heap scorn on them. It's an uphill battle.

[frankly_fedup2]

4. I am not that familiar with the New Republic; however, I have heard

it advertised on Air America so I ASSumed they were representing the Democratic side of the debate. Lowry sure is a strong neocon with his comments and accusations. Lizza is obviously a pacifist.

No, this is not "balanced" enough for a real and fair debate on the SOTU.

Lowry is good with the name calling and smirking. Lizza is not aggressively debating anything with Lowry.

There is that backbone issue again.