Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arlen Specter says, "This is a big, big, big issue..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:27 PM
Original message
Arlen Specter says, "This is a big, big, big issue..."
Referring to the domestic spying and the bypass of the FISA courts by this White House and the NSA. He sounded as if he is very serious at getting to the bottom of this story. We shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's something going on there
This isn't the first time he's mentioned this. He said something similar diring the Alito nomination hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And Voted To Confirm Alito
Specter is all mouth and no trousers if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. He's all mouth and nothing IN the trousers.
And nothing he says is worth spit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Dammit, these hearings should have been held BEFORE the hearing to
confirm Alito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, the prez declaring himself king and above all laws and any constraint
from the legislature, is a big, big issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. correct me if i am wrong...
it seems i remember reading that specter's main problem is that it is illegal...not that it should be illegal. in other words, he thinks there is a problem w/ the admin doing this, but only because it's illegal, and we should change the laws to make it legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's David Brook's line
Like this is a 10 second fix by Congress, NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. are you saying ...
that this IS specter's reasoning, or that d. brooks makes an unsubstantiated claim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. the first time that I heard David Brooks words coming
Edited on Sun Feb-05-06 02:35 PM by MissWaverly
out of Sean Hannity's mouth I was blown away, what I am trying to say that they are the
shiny new Republican talking points and are faxed around by everyone's favorite PR guy
Karl Rove. The spin is that this is no big deal and just needs congress to take some time
out of their busy schedule to help George fight the war on terror. They completely miss
that innocent American citizens are having their rights step on in violation of the 4th
amendment, this will never be fair without probable cause. This is not about Osama this
is about violation of the right to privacy guaranteed to all US citizens.

Last Friday, I posted the statement below, the FBI used the Patriot Act to gather financial
information on 1 million innocent US citizens.

Las Vegas Mayor Oscar B. Goodman loves to remind visitors of Sin City's oh-so-discreet tagline: "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas." But since the New Year's celebrations ringing in 2004, he has had to modify the motto. Fearing a terrorist attack, the FBI descended on casinos, car rental agencies, storage warehouses, and other Las Vegas businesses with sheaves of "national security letters" demanding financial records covering about 1 million revelers. Startled business owners who questioned the action were told they had one choice: cough up their documents or wind up in court.

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/nov2005/nf20051110_9709_db016.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. interesting article
never heard that bit of news on the "news" reports (msm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. we need to be the media
I am convinced the MSM knows this but they have been intimidated by Bush and are no longer
a free press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
30. It's also about the separation of powers. The legislature can't
simply legislate away all judicial oversight of our rights -- despite the current executive's fervent wishes (and claims that they can do it unilaterally).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Thank you for posting this
we must maintain the guarantees to our freedom outlined in the constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. That's my read. He wants to make it legal and give bushie an out.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randypiper Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yes
THE SITUATION ROOM

SPECTER:

"But I don't think that there's any call here for a special prosecutor. There's -- there's no showing of mens rea, or criminal intent, or bad faith on the part of the president. We just had a special prosecutor, a very high-profile one in Fitzgerald. And we ended up a "New York Times" reporter in jail for 85 days. And we still don't know what that investigation was all about."

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/23/sitroom.02.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. "We stiil don't know what that investigation was all about"???
WTF? He talks likes it's all over and Fitzgerald came up empty!

He doesn't know what it was about? Hell, I'm not even in the Senate and I know what it's about. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. You mean, like commiting perjury over a question that involves a
private and legal matter is illegal, but shouldn't be because the other party may use this kind of information for blackmail, and we should change the laws to make it legal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. At least it's a start
I mean, what can we expect from a Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. What, and make the new laws retroactive?
Oops, I've said too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guidod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. I wonder if there were any
back room deals made so they could get cloture on Alito. Just a thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
36. Exactomundo
Specter is cleaning up Smirky's little mess for him.

"Oh this is terrible and illegal, but LordGawdBush is only trying to protect us from the unwashed hordes, so here, look, see(?), we must have congress change the law to make LordGawDBush's noble conduct 'legal'....now vote for this legislation to make what he is doing legal."

See how easy it is to make LordGawdBush into a saint and clean up his droppings? Oh, and just start counting the 'dems' who will vote to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Specter is just another Republican. He says one thing, does the
opposite. He has been on my shit list since the Thomas/Hill fiasco. Our world here in the U.S. is held in the hands of liars and cheats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. And I say Specter is a big, big, big asshole!
Yeah, like he's not going to eventually bend over and take it from Bush and his Nazis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lord I hope so
I have this utter horror that he'll hold a few days of hearings and give his stamp of approval to any spying Bushco wants to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. The ONLY chance anything will come of this is if people keep up the
pressure by emailing (www.congress.org) that Bush violated the FISA law and his oath of office to protect and defend the constitution and respect the civil rights of all Americans. We MUST keep up the pressure with thousands of emails. Just keep emailing and tell everybody you know this must be done. The politicians will not do the right thing if the political pressure to let Bush off is greater than the pressure from citizens to see that Bush is held accountable.

It will probably take an avalanche of emails though. (obviously, emailing those coming up for re-election would be the most effective.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Spector will have to come up with some BIG, BIG, LIES to cover this one
for the BOY KING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. I once had a hearing |----THIS BIG----| !!!
Please. I'll believe it when I see someone got to jail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Specter is not going to do anything to...
jeopardize his chairmanship. If he were to have real hearings concerning this domestic spying he would not be chairman of the judiciary committee for very long therefore more rhetoric than substance with him. He sold out too many years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
22. I thought he said a couple weeks ago there was not a problem.
Specter is all talk he likes to play good cop before he kicks you in the...... You get the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
23. It doesn't just violate Federal Law...it violates the US Constitution.
It is a felony and shows sufficient grounds for IMPEACHMENT.

peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JMDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. This would be "Magic Bullet" Arlen, right?
The guy who shaped so much of the BS in the Warren Commission and who pushed the magic bullet theory down everyone's throats?

I wonder why he's so concerned about the Constitution?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dissident2006 Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. Repugs are giving up on Boosh n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
26. Senator Arlen Sphincter always talks out his ass.
But never comes through.

He's useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
29. Almost as big as, say, the magic bullet theory
eh, Arlen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
31. When Russert on MtheP asked Specter about subpoenaing former Bushies,
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 04:52 AM by AtomicKitten
Specter said he was thinking about. The people in question are specifically those in the Justice Department who would not sign off on the domestic spying, also referred to as the Terrorist Surveillance Program by Faux News. I doubt very seriously that Specter has any intention of doing a damn thing about this, just like Roberts white-washed the 9/11 Commission.

Of interest was the signing statement Jimmy Carter put with the FISA law he signed into effect:
"It clarifies the executive's authority to gather foreign intelligence by electric surveillance in the United States."

This suggests that any inherent powers in Article 2 of the Constitution, or other legislation, that this FISA law was central and now would be controlling.

When Russert asked Specter if he would call Carter to testify, Specter replied he's thinking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
32. SPECTER IS TALKING OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF HIS MOUTH.
he is saying one thing, like he is going to go after the criminals, but he is doing another, he is protecting the bushcoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unmarked Poster Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Exactly
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. hi!
:hi: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. He didn't require Gonzales to testify under oath. That sounds an alarm. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
34. "We won't get to the inner workings of what is being done"?????
Spector just set the ground rules that we will get nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
38. It so big, he placates to the fascists to conduct dog and pony charade
Specter is the most loyal brown shirt through and through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
41. How big is it? It's so big that...
...that we don't even put the main witness under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC