Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It pisses me off that they continually invoke the "war"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:23 PM
Original message
It pisses me off that they continually invoke the "war"
We are not, in my opinion, at war. We are in a conflict that the bushies like to call a war because it gives them, they think, carte blanche to do whatever they want to do. In a time of war, Congress declares war. In a time of war, the American people are asked to sacrifice. In a time of war, the country's belt tightens--we don't spen money we don't have to give rich folks tax breaks. In a time of war, we go after the enemy that attacked us, not some diversion called Iraq. No my friends, I don't think we are at war. That is not to say that the young men and women of our armed forces nor the civilian Iraqis are no less important. But this is bush's folly, it is not a war. It is cheney's and his chickenhawk brethren's feeble attempt to exercise some antiquated and neaderthal policy they cooked up in smokey back rooms.

Were we attacked on 9-11? Yes we were. It was a tragedy. 3000 innocent Americans lost their lives. Were the folks who did it wrong? Absolutely. And we should have stayed in Afghanistan and finished the job instead of going into Iraq on this folly. But the reason they want to call it a war is to divert attention from the fact that they, this ignorant, corrupt, and arrogant, administration, screwed the pooch. I believe now and I will always believe that we would have foiled 9-11 if those at the top had listened to those underneath them who told them where the security issues rested. I believe that this adminsitration fell asleep at the wheel. They should have prevented 9-11. They could have prevented 9-11. They simply did not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. 9-11 was bought and paid for
by Bushco financiers, that's why they didn't stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bravo!!! And I love calling it "BUSH'S FOLLY' because that is just
what it is! From now on we should ALL refer to the Iraq war as Bush's Folly. Does anyone second that motion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Funny how they just happened to fall asleep at the wheel
before an event that would launch the well documented NeoCon Agenda of "full spectrum dominance"
Amazing how greatly they and their corporate friends benefited from their own so called incompetence.

Funny how there is a Pakistani ISI connection to 911 that no body talks about.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=107432

Until we challenge them on 911 and demand a new truly independent investigation, not one headed up
by Condi Rice's buddy, we are doomed to failure. 911 is their excuse for everything.

Wake Up America.
The official story of 911 is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I call it the "Lucky Accident" theory:
All the neocon's dreams came true, as if by magic, through sheer incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC