Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone should have called Gonzales out yesterday...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 02:04 PM
Original message
Someone should have called Gonzales out yesterday...
My mom picked up on something when Gonzales cited FDR monitoring telephones during WWII, Wilson monitoring telegraphs and telegrams in WWI, Lincoln getting copies of telegrams in the Civil War, and Washington having his troops copy British mail.

The three most recent presidents can all be legitimately (somewhat, as Lincoln had no modern day electronic devices) cited as back-ups for Gonzales' point. But Washington just doesn't fit. Do you know why?

Washington had NO CONSTITUTION to refer to regarding rights and such things as that!!!! The Constitution wasn't written until 1789!!

So I think Gonzales bombed out on that one. Too bad no Senator (that I saw, and I may have missed it) caught that one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everything changed after FISA
to paraphrase Fearless Leader's own words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's nothing but a " tio tomas."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. He also said Washington approved electronic surveillance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think Feingold mentioned in the hearings yesterday
that 4th amendment protection wasn't extended to telephone until some decision in the 1960s I can't remember what year so I don't know if JFK, LBJ or Nixon was president when the decision came down. At any rate, any president before that decision didn't need a warrent - after the decision they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC