Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(VT) Lawmakers oppose federal eavesdropping program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:22 AM
Original message
(VT) Lawmakers oppose federal eavesdropping program

Lawmakers oppose federal eavesdropping program


February 9, 2006

MONTPELIER, Vt. --Some Vermont lawmakers are denouncing President Bush's controversial surveillance program.

A nonbinding resolution signed by about 45 House members is calling on Vermont state agencies not to go along with the eavesdropping program unless they know that it complies with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.

"The resolution ... is one means by which we can get a message out and go on the record," said Rep. Michael Fisher, D-Lincoln.

The National Security Agency has been monitoring terror-related international phone calls and e-mails when one party to the call is in the United States.

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, including Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has been holding hearings on the program this week.


more...

http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2006/02/09/lawmakers_oppose_federal_eavesdropping_program/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Also TSA condemns failed registry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue in ohio Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. more states
Why can't more states challenge this with the supremely right court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. US judge concerned by Bush's surveillance program

US judge concerned by Bush's surveillance program


1 hour, 42 minutes ago


WASHINGTON (AFP) - A US Justice Department lawyer has warned the presiding judge of a secret surveillance court that information obtained through a domestic wiretap program may have been improperly used to obtain warrants in the court.

Citing two unnamed sources, the Washington Post reported Thursday that the revelations infuriated US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who had expressed serious doubts about whether the warrantless monitoring of phone calls and e-mails ordered by President George W. Bush was legal.

Both Kollar-Kotelly and her predecessor, Royce Lamberth, had insisted that no information obtained this way be used to gain warrants from their court, and both had been assured by administration officials it would never happen, the report said.

The two heads of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court were the only judges in the country briefed by the administration on Bush's program, The Post said.

more...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060209/pl_afp/usattacksintelligence_060209144653
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Green Mountain!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC