NYT article analyzes the Palestinian election

[ProSense]

Maybe next they can focus on fraud in Ohio and gerrymandering in Texas.

February 19, 2006
The World

A Lesson From Hamas: Read the Voting Law's Fine Print

By JAMES GLANZ
DEMOCRACY rests on the will of the majority. Or so the speeches say. But in reality, election systems are almost never designed to achieve majority rule alone. Like the famous checks and balances of the American system, they also try to give a wide range of groups a portion of power. But sometimes the framers of an election law can wildly miscalculate, allowing one faction to game the system and gain power far out of proportion to its share of the vote.

That's what seems to have happened in Hamas's victory in the Palestinian territories, according to a new analysis by an American who advised the Palestinian Authority on the elections. It represents a cautionary tale for other new democracies, like Iraq's, whose systems are being designed with the help of outside experts.

The reasons behind the overwhelming Hamas victory in the Palestinian elections go beyond a vote that was split among the numerous candidates backed by Fatah, the former ruling party, this new analysis shows. It strongly suggests that a quirk in the electoral law itself helped convert a slight margin in the popular vote into a landslide for the group.

The analysis was performed by Jarrett Blanc, the American elections expert, who also has worked on elections in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kosovo and Nepal. The lesson is that the way a new election law turns votes into representatives — the fine print of election laws — can have as much of an impact on who will be running a country as an occupying army.

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/19/weekinreview/19glanz.html

SCOTUS on TX gerrymandering:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2467525&mesg_id=2467525