Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP targeting churches...again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:34 PM
Original message
GOP targeting churches...again
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 05:35 PM by ProSense
Posted on Sat, Feb. 18, 2006

N.C. POLITICS

Church leaders criticize GOP effort to get membership lists


The Associated Press

RALEIGH, N.C. - Some church leaders in North Carolina have asked their members to ignore a request made this week by the state Republican Party for copies of church directories that the GOP wants to use in voter-registration efforts.

A spokesman for the Catholic Diocese of Charlotte, which covers 46 counties, said the group does not share parishioners' contact information with anyone.

Snip...

That message would apply to parishioners as well, he said.
The request, sent statewide by e-mail Thursday, said that research by the national Republican Party shows "people who regularly attend church usually vote Republican when they vote."

Snip...

"We believe that people go to church to worship and not to sign up to receive Republican propaganda," Meek said. "I would say the vast majority of Democrats are Democrats because of their faith, not in spite of it. But that is a place that is so sacred that we should not inject politics into the church."

http://www.ohio.com/mld/myrtlebeachonline/news/local/13903862.htm?source=rss&channel=myrtlebeachonline_local
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can you image what would happen if the Democrats tried something like this
:eyes: Yep. That must be in. No person of faith can possibly be a Democrat. That's so intellignet. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Democrats are godless, unwashed heathens.
Duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roaming Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, unfortunately democrats do stuff like this too
Black baptist churches, at least in my neck of the woods, were visited frequently by political candidates during the last election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Um, there's a huge difference between a candidate visiting a
church and a political party demanding a list of parishoners to use in trolling for sure thing voters. The former is entirely voluntary, as the parishoners may choose to give it a miss. The latter is a party demand and parishoners have their names supplied without their permission if the church complies.

That's the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roaming Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't think politics should be mixed with religion
This candidate (John Edwards) was invited to speak between the opening songs and just before the sermon. I just think that's inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What did he say that was so inappropriate?
Waht specifically did he do that was overtly political or that was disrespecful of where he was? Or are you put off by the fact that he is a politician?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roaming Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He was a politician basically participating in a religious service
to gain votes. Whatever he said (and it was basically his platform values but nontheless) I don't think that's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetladybug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Roaming you're right, black churches were visited frequently by political
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 06:08 PM by sweetladybug
candidates in the last election and probably every other election. The difference between Democrats visiting churches and Republicans visit churches is:

1)Democrats visit churches in order to (hopefully) appeal to good hearted true christians that want to help the needy.

2)Republicans visit churches in order to use people by manipulating and conning them to vote AGAINST their own best interest and for the interest of the wealthiest citizens. Republicans are using religion for their own selfish greed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roaming Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I guess I'm just more jaded than you, ladybug
But I appreciate your comments.

I don't think the motives differ either way between the parties. It just isn't a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I don't care that politicians visit churches.
I don't like church roosters going to political campaigns. I certainly would not want to be on a rethug mailing list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. But that's what they HAVE been doing for each election!
The church members were the base they used to get their message out to everywhere. They gave them their weekly talking points, and what to say and what legislators to call. That's how the "family values" thing was kept alive in 2004!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fundies are the only base they have left;
That's the 33% that makes you say huh!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Trying to obtain a church's membership list
cannot be compared to a politician visiting a church. The GOP got caught pushing their message via the pulpit, so they decided go after church goers by mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joneschick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. ding! ding! ding! We have a winner!
We have two entirely different enterprises here. A demand for church registry doesn't sound to me as though the church goers permission has been even considered. A visit from a politician, would be at the invitation of the church goers. Now I will grant you that my church affiliation is with a denomination that operates from the congregation and has no real hierarchical office to answser to. Our denomination does have a headquarters and all that, but we are thoroughly self-directed. I suspect the Southern Baptists take direction and are acted upon by a hierarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Personally
I don't think Jesus would've wanted to be associated with any political group

But he sure as hell wasn't conservative, I know that much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC