Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Think Osama prefers Dubai Ports over Bush buddies Managing US Ports?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JamRock Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 06:50 PM
Original message
Think Osama prefers Dubai Ports over Bush buddies Managing US Ports?
Edited on Mon Feb-20-06 06:51 PM by JamRock
Did 911 happen because Arabs had infiltrated U.S. customs, inspection, intelligence, government???? I suspect some here who believe there were some other controlling factors behind the 911 catastrophe.

Dubai Ports World is reputed be one of the most technologically advanced, sophisticated and well managed global shipping operations in the world. Its larger competitors, such as Hutchinson, are gobbling up smaller operators around the globe, including much of Asia.

Now, could someone explain to me why DP World's management of a few U.S. ports be “scary” or any less secure that the lax management by the financially troubled UK ports operator P & O that it recently acquired?

Please explain what DP World could do to make U.S. port security weaker that that in currently is under the generally neglectful eye of the Bush Admin which currently provides ZERO inspection to 95% of all port cargo.

I suspect that port-management is not as attractive to Bush/Cheney buddies at Halliburton et al as the oil and war-profiteering business or else those other folks would have those deals.

Frankly, I will fell much safer with Dubai Ports operating port security that some chosen Halliburton subsidiary!!!!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I see your point.
The problem is an admin that outsources to corporations that may or may not care about national security. There's NO effort to check the corp. hanlding the effort, domestic or foreign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. why do we have to contract everything out?
Have local or state governments run their ports and use unionized American workers to do the work. Let's increase the number of good jobs in this country, not outsource every fucking thing that isn't nailed down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamRock Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Iraqis are asking just that as billions of their $$ vanish to US corp
incompetence, fraud and corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And that's not right either.
Certainly you're not using that as a justification for the port ownership change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamRock Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Port Management is currently by a Brittish-owned firm
Edited on Mon Feb-20-06 08:38 PM by JamRock
Question is: what's the problem. 9/11 did not happen just because of evil Arabs in
position of power. The 19 were obviously just pawns is a bigger game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting perspective, we should have tried it in WWII
Edited on Mon Feb-20-06 08:55 PM by Timefortruth
rather than fighting those nasty Nazis and Japanese, we should have offered them ownership in America. That way they'd never dare to attack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamRock Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. No, its like banning all dealings with Europe because Nazis were European
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. RNC talking points
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because they financed the alleged 9-11 terrorists?
That's the story. This company was investigated as part of the financing machinery directly involved with 9-11. I believe they worked hand-in-hand with BushCo, then as now, but they were part of the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamRock Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Are you buying the PNAC "Terror" propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Bad call.
The neocon propaganda is designed to make you scared of Saddam and Iran (whilst staying quiet about Bushco business dealings with other countries in the ME).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. They're all the same
Bush and Arab partners; UAE, BCCI, Riggs Bank, money laundering, funding terrorists. Military, oil, communications, shipping ports and lines. They control everything. DP World isn't an independent company any more than BCCI was an independent bank. Just like they use non-profits to launder their money here at home, they use whole countries to launder their money overseas. How can a country who is trying to improve trade relations with the dreaded Iran be our partner in fighting terrorists at the exact same time. It's complete and total madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamRock Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. That IS the point. Same except for the demogogic, anti-arab aspects
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 09:06 AM by JamRock
This political miss-step is great for Dems to exploit. Obviously the decision was not
reviewed by Karl Rove. But, truth be told, there is likely much more danger in the level of corruption in Port management by many other parties
who are given a pass because they are not Arab.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. 9/11 happened
bcause the people at the top let it happen (and did whatever they could to disrupt/disable normal procedures).

As for this company, doesn't matter how good their procedures are, people at the top can always bypass procedures if they need to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC