|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:01 PM Original message |
Dubai Ports -- Inept Dem politics AGAIN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Dems just don't seem to know ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. It's the media that makes hay of things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 03:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. it is the Corporate Neo Conservative Media that is upset with the ports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconocrastic (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
31. At least we have Air America. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. actually, your post is premature expectoration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. One name Joe Biden, the scourge of pooches everywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canichelouis (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Good ol' Joe Leiberman has been there already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. No kidding, is Holy Joe going against *? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 08:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
54. UH, Joe veneers over cooked at the tanning salon n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. Your analysis is simplistic and devoid of any data to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I happen to have a little knowledge about Port Facilities Operators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. One thing to remember about ports. Favorite target of spies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. that's an interesting point to observe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
30. Dubai run opperations is the worst cover for any spy in anti-arab environ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 03:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. So I am correct that you are positing that keeping quiet now and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 05:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Not as true Security issue. So oppose but don't demagogue until the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RazzleDazzle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 05:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
28. And real damn dangerous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconocrastic (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
32. Bingo. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Barrett (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. The Democrats won the last two elections. Where have you been? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Barrett (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 10:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
59. Comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Whoa!! I am frankly staggered by the sanity of your remarks here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. As a Leftist, very Intent in Having the Left Be Heard, Please Demonstrate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Barrett (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 11:05 AM Response to Reply #18 |
60. Defined The Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NativeTexan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
9. The Republicans HAVE to disagree, if they are smart..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Did Anyone See Pres. Jimmy Carter's Remarks With Wolfie B. Yesterday? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Apparently the Ports have been Owned and Controlled by Multi-Nationals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
14. Actually, this was an issue that enraged Conservative pieces of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm no Defender of stupid politics but Bush has been given so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
20. Whatever!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
22. I don't agree with the premise of this post - what i want to know : |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 03:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Check this post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubya_dubya_III (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 05:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Not only this, but aren't they running the British Ports too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconocrastic (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:39 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Clever screen name. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubya_dubya_III (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 08:43 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. But seriously tho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
26. No! You do not put the country at risk just to have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-21-06 06:24 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. This Port Conglomerate Deal -- Not a real Port Security problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RogueTrooper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 05:30 AM Response to Original message |
34. You are saying that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 05:36 AM Response to Original message |
35. Guess how the GOP would respond? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. This was not subject to Congressional oversight, but Admin review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. I agree -- there are far more serious issues the Dems should be addressing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
36. another bush fuck up..... another attack dem thread. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #36 |
62. Yep. Interesting how that works, isn't it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
38. Deleted message |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
39. Not true! This issue couldn't be let to simmer. Deadline for the deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Acebass (926 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
40. first of all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Acebass (926 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
41. But we're not blind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
submerged99 (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:02 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. The time is now to undermine Bush's "tough on terror" campaign-not in Oct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Acebass (926 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:17 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. The irony is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. My point is that some Dems are jumping the gun without strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
submerged99 (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:33 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Why would he back out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Just watch! We have given Repub enough warning of the price |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 09:11 AM Response to Reply #42 |
58. Agree, a sustained pressure campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
48. Or you could look at it another way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamRock (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 02:43 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Good Points. I do think SOME Dems are demagoguing for Short-term advantage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. It doesn't matter what the repuglicans do.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:46 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. you don't - it's as simple as that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 03:42 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. I'll drink to that, AcomicKitten! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
55. This is your Fifth Thread telling Dems to make political hay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
56. LOL! Yeah, there's a strategy - just lie low and don't criticize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
57. Welcome to DU - I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
61. Inept Republican politics - AGAIN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
63. So Democrats should shut up, do nothing, let BushCo do whatever it wants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 10th 2024, 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC