Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are you political or principled?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:18 PM
Original message
Are you political or principled?
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 06:19 PM by darboy
Do you want to "win" at any cost, or are you more concerned with standing up for what you believe in?

I definitely fall into the principled camp. I'm willing to tolerate the Russ Feingolds. Why? He'll vote to protect and promote the programs and ideas we value. I'm willing to support Dennis Kucinich. A Senator Nelson is fine in a red state but, I don't want to see dems from blue states giving in to Republican fear-mongering.

So which are you? Political or principled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mixed depending on the situation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why is Feingold a "tolerate" vs. "support?"
If he'll vote to protect and promote the programs and ideas we value, why do you merely tolerate him?


I'm somewhere in between -- a pragmatist. Ultimately, we do have a de facto two-party system, and a (D) next to one's name pretty much ensures a vote for Speaker Pelosi or Majority Leader Reid (for example, and omitting the Zell Millers of the world). Even the suckiest Dem is better in that one respect than the best Republican.

In other words -- I'm not going to actively work to get rid of Herb Kohl, because (1) it's an impossible task, and (2) at the end of the day, he's still a (D).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. yes, well...
and omitting the Zell Millers of the world

Some of us voted for Zell, and would like to avoid making a mistake of that kind again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. In the end, winning is the only safety.
I dunno what I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. i'm curious as to why you said you would tolerate Russ Feingold.
i find him quite tolerable. :dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. see a thread called
Are you a Purist or a Pragmatist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. i need a link. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. more principled than political, and damned proud of it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sorry, but I don't accept the premise of your question
I would assume that everyone has principles. The question is the extent to which you are willing to engage in the give and take of politics in order to advance those principles. From the way you phrased your question, it would appear that you believe that people who are unwilling to make compromises are somehow more principled than others. I'd be willing to argue the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. not everyone has principles
the people who believe the sole purpose of a political party is "to win", I say do not have principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Name one person who believes that
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. When we get people on here cheering for specimens
like Ron "Dr. No" Paul or anti-Semitic Cynthia McKinney, is that "principled"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm principled... and political....
And my principles have, up to now, made me have no choice but to support the Democratic Party. That means my principles made me political. But, as some Democrats are becoming more and more like Republicans every day, the way I vote in the future will become increasingly more principled, to the point that I will vote race by race, candidate by candidte for those (and only those) who share my principles with me. No DINO's or DLC need apply.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Tolerate the Russ Feingolds"?
:wtf: :rofl:
:rofl:





:think: Is there more than one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. it depends on the situation
Absolutes are a luxury usually unavailable to decision-makers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Its a false choice...
Fact is, our country was founded on compromise, and became successful on compromise. Our greatest failures have come when we refused to compromise. Will I take a half a loaf if I can't get the full thing...hell ya. Would I vote for Ben Nelson if the alternative was a hard right Republican...again hell ya.

The best way to turn this country around is to get this pack of Republicans out of office...and if a few Ben Nelson's are a part of that process...I can certainly live with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. principled.... for many reasons. but to just be political
will only feed the bad we are and never allow us to heal and become a better person as a whole. to be political will continue the divide that does no good for our nation. principle must start feeding of each other so we can become a stronger better people. i cannot be less than that, not even for the nation or the future of our children, cause ultimately it will be failure. and that is probably beyond what you are asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. See my post on that other thread you referenced:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2472874&mesg_id=2474714

I don't see the world that black and white, and don't divide things into "principled or political."

I prefer to say that I have political principles, and that I strive to make my political choices principled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. The principled is political. Don't turn either into a dirty word.
IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Agreed. It's like the student who proved Scalia is a relativist!
One group tags a word with special powers of labeling, and then they tag others with it, as in YOU'RE IT!!

Bah! Bah! I say!

I reject all arguments that start with the premise I'm either THIS or THAT, and they're mutually exclusive.

I'll be whatever I feel like today in this circumstance given these parameters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
21. principled, I'd like to think. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. YES N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC