Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback to the 2004 Election Cycle on Port Security: Kerry Was Right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:25 PM
Original message
Flashback to the 2004 Election Cycle on Port Security: Kerry Was Right
Flashback to the 2004 Election Cycle on Port Security: Kerry Was Right
February 22nd, 2006 @ 2:20 pm

The DSCC released information about Republican Senators and port security earlier today, see my post here. There’s a lot of chatter in the blogosphere about this deal, on the left and the right. Ron pointed out in the comments below, that conservative blog was calling Democrats “newly security conscious.” However, that is certainly not the case…

On December 17, 2003 John Kerry unveiled a “Plan to Improve Port Security and Prevent Terrorists from Obtaining WMD’s.” In another Kerry was right moment, John Kerry said:

“In this dangerous world, we don’t know what that cargo really contains. And we can’t afford to continue being in the dark. We screen millions of shoes in airports everyday, but less than four percent of the 21,000 enormous shipping containers that arrive in America’s ports every day. Any one of them could have a biological, chemical, or nuclear weapon inside. We need to invest in and employ new technologies to screen the containers, ships, trains, and trucks that come into this country.”

How ironic, that Kerry saw the need to improve port security over two years ago, yet Bush has done nothing about it. Now in the wake of this UAE state-owned Dubai Port World deal to take over 6 major U.S. ports, it certainly seems as though port security is not really a concern of the Bush administration yet during the 2004 election cycle Bush consistently said it was. In October 2004, Bush was playing politics (as Digby pointed out) when he tried to paint Kerry as soft on National Security:

I will never hand over America’s security decisions to foreign leaders and international bodies that do not have America’s interests at heart.

MORE & LINKS - http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2028
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry must have quoted that 95% of the containers in the ports
were NOT inspected on a daily basis. He said it so often that when he got to those statements, I knew exactly what he was going to say. Didn't he mention it in the debates as well.

Not to mention that even before he ran, Kerry went after BCCI which operated a main branch out of Dubai. Too bad no one in either party supported him, in the pre 911 world, he was the only one who clearly saw the danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reality is/was - Kerry too erudite to be president in today's US
'Muricans prefer squinty-eyed, simple minded, cowboy types - is Buddy Ebsen still alive? Maybe we can run him for president...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Buddy Ebsen...
was the original Tin Man... ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. you're right !!
LOL, it hadn't occurred to me when I first posted that comment... And you're right - Buddy Ebsen was originally cast as the Tin Man, but suffered an alergic reaction to the aluminum makeup and was replaced by Jack Haley in the role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Now that's just sad; I was and still am attracted to Kerry
because of his intelligence. It's so disheartening to see what we as a country missed out on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The delusion that people could have a beer with Bush.
I actually know people who've had one with Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, no surprised there!
John Kerry was widely known as the better candidate.....and should be in office as we speak.

There are a lot of things that many said that many don't know were said. That's the state of affairs in these United States as it stands!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Supremes and the treasonous Pugs have a lot to answer
for by cheating Gore and Kerry out of their legitimate wins. James Baker and his cronies should be tarred and feathered and dropped in the Pacific Ocean with lead shoes. Imagine America with a Gore presidency. It is heartbreaking. Global warming and species extinction is NO.1 with Bush and the Neo-conmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. he could have used pie charts, like Perot, for people who have no clue
what 95% means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. He also said that this country couldn't take four more years of George Bus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kerry spoke extensively on Port Security in the First Debate
The one where Bush was blinking, stammering and stuttering.

Many of the statements made by Kerry during the 2004 campaign cycle have been extremely astute and prescient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes they have. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC