Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are Form. Pres` Carter and B.Clinton in Sup. of ports deal as Strat. to...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
oscarguy Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:24 PM
Original message
Are Form. Pres` Carter and B.Clinton in Sup. of ports deal as Strat. to...
as a Democratic strategy to alienate right wingers who have been programmed to hate everything these former Dem. Presidents ever stand for? This notion, take on their support of PORTS DEAL to use against Bush, is not original to me. It was presented to me in response to a previous posting of mine by,NOT COMPLETE WEB NAME: iamt... . I do not wish to post this person`s web identity without that person`s permission. With that said: I have thought about it for many hours and it feels right to me. Why else would Carter and Bill Clinton come out at this time with positive noises about this UAE ports deal ? These two men are not likely to be running for office again, and by agreeing with Bush would piss off right wingers towards Bush. It makes sense. Maybe Democrats are finally learning a few tricks of their own. If this is so, it is about time. ...Oscar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting theory
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 10:30 PM by waiting for hope
but I think Carter has his own thoughts and ideas and just him being him pisses the Repukes off. As for Bill, I don't know - I listened to Hillary on C-Span the other day and she was very clever and demanding with her questioning. But, on the other hand, there have been a few times I have felt that Bill has distanced himself from her i.e. Flag Burning... I'm think this whole situation is doing nothing but helping out the Repukes that are up for reelection in 2006 by showing their displeasure - it just plain smacks of Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscarguy Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why on Earth would B. Clinton be supp. a Bush Prop. That Dem.s oppose...
by and large? Event if he actually agreed with it with I seriously doubt, why come out and say such at this time when Republicans are event running away from Bush on this issue? iam`s logic feels right to me.The GOP has been programming our Nation to hate everything these men ever stood or stand for. They are among a very few to make supportive statements regarding this PORTS DEAL. I was surfing the web and saw a cartoon with BUSH looking aghast at a caricature of Jimmy Carter supporting his policy. Maybe we have some real pro`s working for us as to Public Relations,people who know how to win these PR campaigns. I hope so. ...Oscar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I always thought Carter to be fairly honest and does come down on strange
and unexpected sides of issues sometimes.

As far as Bill Clinton goes, he bought into this free trade globalization bull shit long ago so I can see why he would support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscarguy Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. My feeling is that Carter is easily manipulated because he is trusting...
of others, too trusting. He trusted Brzezinski in support of Jihadis vs USSR, which I thought at that time was LUNACY. The Jihadis being much more dangerous to our interests than the USSR was in Afghanistan. All anyone had to do was listen to what the Jihadis had to say to realize they were no friend of the U.S.A.. ...Oscar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm Sure Clinton and Carter are Both Speaking Their Minds
They have a balanced view of security and foreign relations, are pro-business, and are not easily swayed by polemics from any quarter. The UAE probably feels like a trustworthy partner to them.

I think a lot of security concerns are a little overblown, and in a different situation might support the deal. But it's infuriating to see the administration's hypocrisy and double-standards on this deal when they're engaging in scare tactics on every other issue.

On the Afghanis, it's hard to put oneself in the mindset of 1979. The Soviets were a huge power, they were expanding (at least in this case), and what they did was not too different from what Bush is doing in Iraq now. It should have been opposed. Militant Islamic groups, on the other hand, were mostly a theoretical threat. Their anger was only occasionally directed toward the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscarguy Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bill CLINTON never said this. I was wrong ! I am soft as grape....
Please forgive me. I must crazier than I realized. Sorry everyone, ...Oscar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. the deal ain't evil
carter and clinton are big time capitalists. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. all i heard carter say was, i am sure they checked it all out
why he is sure they checked it all out after five years of bush incompetence i dont know. but he was on show talking about stuff and was asked about this. who knows how informed he is. and maybe just assuming it was well investigated before approval
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Carter micromanaged everything...many say he could have been
better president if he hadn't hovered over every decision.....but compared to W??

he probably said this b/c he can't imagine president not fully investigating something like this

altho surely he's learned what an uninvolved 'person' W is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC