Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guantánamo is symbol of injustice, says Goldsmith

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:36 PM
Original message
Guantánamo is symbol of injustice, says Goldsmith
Richard Norton-Taylor
Thursday May 11, 2006
The Guardian


<snip>

Going far further than cabinet ministers, notably Tony Blair, have done in their criticism, he described the existence of the camp on Cuba as "unacceptable".

He added: "It is time, in my view, that it should close. Not only would it, in my personal opinion, be right to close Guantánamo as a matter of principle, I believe it would also help to remove what has become a symbol to many - right or wrong - of injustice."

The "historic tradition of the United States as a beacon of freedom, liberty and of justice deserves the removal of this symbol", he said. Speaking at a conference on international terrorism at the Royal United Services Institute in London - at which he defended the government's succession of anti-terror laws - Lord Goldsmith said it was "essential in some cases to be flexible" and accept some limitation of rights. But he said: "There are certain principles on which there can be no compromise. Fair trial is one of those."

That was the reason, he said, why the government was unable to accept the US military tribunals proposed for those detained at Guantánamo Bay. Lord Goldsmith's remarks reflect growing anger among lawyers about Guantánamo Bay. Last week, Lord Justice Latham and Mr Justice Tugendhat said evidence that British residents held in the camp were deprived of their fundamental rights was a "powerful" argument for demanding that the government insist on the release of British residents there. But they added: "Decisions affecting foreign policy are a forbidden area" for the courts.

<snip>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/guantanamo/story/0,,1772226,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarfurDude Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not what most think
It's a very bad case of officers with vendetta's and issues. It's not the military as a whole, just a few isolated cases. There is no conclusive evidence that Guanatanamo is one of these cases. Goldsmith is merely generalizing off of the over mediaized Abu Garhaib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If you read the article, I think it is clear that
the issue is the lack of fair trials. Gitmo itself is a travesty. I cannot imagine any legitimate reason for keeping people in the outdoor cages they have. That has NOTHING to do with officer "vendettas." The other issue is not getting a trial. Not knowing when you will be able to find out what will happen to you is the biggest kind of mindf*ck for the people held there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. *'s poodle may have to reorganize his cabinet again n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC