Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How John Ashcroft saved his own sorry rear end, and not the lives of 2,973

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 02:32 AM
Original message
How John Ashcroft saved his own sorry rear end, and not the lives of 2,973
http://www.attytood.com/2006/10/how_john_ashcroft_saved_his_ow.html

Just over three years ago, when such things were not in vogue, we wrote an article about the 20 unanwered questions of 9/11. It's sad, but three years later, many of them are still unanswered -- but at least we are finally getting some info. Here's one of those questions we asked on Sept. 11, 2003:

2. Why did Attorney General John Ashcroft and some Pentagon officials cancel commercial-airline trips before Sept. 11?

On July 26, 2001 - 47 days before the Sept. 11 attacks - CBS News reported that Ashcroft was flying expensive charters rather than commercial flights because of a "threat assessment" by the FBI. CBS said, "Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term." Newsweek later reported that on Sept. 10, 2001, "a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns."

Did either Ashcroft or the Pentagon have advance information about a 9/11-style attack and, if so, why wasn't this shared with the American public?

Tonight, it looks like we can answer the first half of this one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've said it before but, what the hell could he have done, anyway?
Could Ashcroft have forced Bush to take the issue seriously? NO.

Could Ashcroft have saved lives by claiming without evidence that is in his legal right to divulge, or with such evidence and therefore exposing himself to deep legal peril, that airplanes were in danger of a coordinated terror offensive, thereby economically harming the airline industry and sparking what would have been widely considered a false panic?

Ashcroft alone couldn't do a damned thing. Not when the President doesn't want to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. After it happened, he could have gone public
He could have become a whistle-blower.
He could have prosecuted the Enron criminals a lot more aggressively.
He was slime.
He hid Lady Liberty behind a curtain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the answer to the second half of this one is pretty obvious to...
any who would only dare to take a few minutes off their busy schedules, and read what the PNAC criminals wrote about their wet dream of seeing some three thousands American citizens and visitors die so they would become much more obscenely rich and wealthy than they already were, at the expense of the working class's blood and tax-money.

lihop :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kicking it simply for the comments at the linked site. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC