Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santorum keys on 'Islamic fascism' (and Dumps on Bush)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:19 PM
Original message
Santorum keys on 'Islamic fascism' (and Dumps on Bush)
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_474278.html

President Bush lacks broad support for the war in Iraq because he's reluctant to depict it as part of a larger struggle against "Islamic fascism" -- a major threat to the nation's security -- U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum said Monday.

"He (Bush) is managing the public relations on this war very poorly," Santorum, the third-ranking Republican in the Senate, said during a meeting with editors and reporters of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

Bush is more concerned about "making the State Department comfortable" than providing the American people with "a clear message and a clear understanding of what we are up against," said Santorum, in his sharpest criticism of the president to date.

Santorum, who faces an uphill battle for re-election against Democrat Bob Casey, said he discussed the issue with Bush several times and said the president "has given a few good speeches on it, but he does not continually do it."

Bush dropped references to Islamic fascists when the State Department "went ballistic because we are offending our allies in the Middle East," Santorum said. "I don't care if we offend our allies in the Middle East."

I smell desperation on little Ricky's part!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. These GOP'ers rubber stamped W completely
and did away with checks and balances, and now they are going against W. Get Real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. If unsanitary Santorum really believes the crap he's spouting,
he is as delusional as is junior.
Santorum is immersed in the destruction of America an deeply as is any other of the neoclown fundies and can only shake the stink of their blood bath among the true believers.

We can expect to see a lot more pseudo-anger as the miscreants are called on the carpet for their misdeeds.
I can only hope the punishment goes farther than simple removal from office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's not gonna work "Desperate Ricky".....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Daytime Friends and Election Time Damage Control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, actually, Iraq was probably the most secular
of the Mideastern countries under Saddam Hussein. Islamic fascism is a relatively new term for me, and one which I believe the Republicans invented in order to make this terrible blunder on Bush's part seem more acceptable. Women had more rights under Saddam, although that has, sadly for Iraqi women, disappeared now that the more militant Shia factions are in a majority. Bush's war is an illegal fiasco, draining lives and money at an alarming pace, and no amount of inventing new phrases, or catchy PR campaigns is going to change that. We are in no position to credibly threaten Iran or N. Korea. Well, we can do it, Bush probably will, but we don't have the ground troops to follow up even massive air strikes.

I've seen some comments that a new war would make the American people rally around the president, but unless we are attacked first, I think he's lost any credibility he ever had. All of his and Cheney's and Rumsfeld's predictions regarding Iraq have been wrong. He has screwed up so much, so throughly, that people, I hope, would be reluctant to put faith once more in his and his administration's wrong policies.

People I've talked to are just tired of it all, the war, the growing number of Americans killed or wounded, and the whole stinking mess he's made of things these past six years. Only the most addicted to the kool-aide wingnuts are going to be enthusiastic about starting more wars, while we watch our economy get bleaker for the middle and lower income families.

Of course, I usually err on the side of crediting the other party with a modicum of common sense, and rational thinking. My family and close friends are all liberal, so unless they appear on t.v., or I read news articles, I don't understand how the neocons reach the conclusions they have. It doesn't make any sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. He must be going after the bone headed voters. You know, the ones
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 10:44 AM by wisteria
who listen to Quinn in the Morning, on the all Repub all the time, Clear Channel station in Pittsburgh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Santorum
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 10:50 AM by IntravenousDemilo
The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex...

He's in deep santorum now, from the look of the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC