Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Say Climate Report Smoking Gun

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:03 AM
Original message
Democrats Say Climate Report Smoking Gun
Edited on Fri Feb-02-07 11:31 AM by ProSense

Democrats Say Climate Report Smoking Gun

Friday February 2, 2007 3:01 PM

By JOHN HEILPRIN

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - A strongly worded global warming report from the world's top climate scientists put pressure Friday on the Bush administration to reduce the United States' growing share of gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.

Democrats newly in control of Congress and other critics of President Bush's environmental policies pounced on the long-awaited United Nations report like fresh meat.

``Although President Bush just noticed that the earth is heating up, the American public, every reputable scientist and other world leaders have long recognized that global warming is real and it's serious. The time to act is now,'' said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who with GOP Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine crafted one of a half-dozen competing bills to address global warming.

Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., a senior member of House panels on energy and natural resources, said that ``for those who are still trying to determine responsibility for global warming, this new U.N. report on climate change is a scientific smoking gun.''

more...


Friday, February 2, 2007

Kerry for ‘realistic’ climate change bill

By Danny Lauridsen SPECIAL TO THE TELEGRAM & GAZETTE

WASHINGTON— U.S. Sen. John F. Kerry, D-Mass., reintroduced bipartisan legislation yesterday intended to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, which he called a major cause of climate change, to 65 percent below the 2000 levels by 2050.

Mr. Kerry joined U.S. Sen. Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine, at a press conference in announcing the Global Warming Reduction Act, which they said would make more of an impact than other proposed legislation that does not include incentives such as tax breaks for businesses and individuals.

Snip...

Of his bill, Mr. Kerry said the 65 percent reduction goal is a key difference from other bills calling for more than 80 percent reduction in the same period of time.

“It’s just not realistic,” he said of the other bills. “No scientist has told me that that’s achievable.”

If passed, Mr. Kerry’s bill would require that the United States freeze emissions in 2010 and then reduce emission levels gradually through the use of clean, renewable energy sources to achieve 10- and 20-year target levels in the transportation, industrial and residential sectors.

more...


Fighting Global Warming

Snip...

The “Global Warming Reduction Act” sets forceful greenhouse gas emissions targets that leading scientists say are the best way to keep temperatures below the danger point. Besides just capping pollution, the Kerry-Snowe plan promotes incentives to buy efficient products that reduce greenhouse gas emissions for American homes, businesses and roads.

more...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting, Prosense.
Basically, we have 10 years. If we don't do it, then it's all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the link. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study

Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study

Ian Sample, science correspondent
Friday February 2, 2007
The Guardian

Scientists and economists have been offered $10,000 each by a lobby group funded by one of the world's largest oil companies to undermine a major climate change report due to be published today.

Letters sent by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), an ExxonMobil-funded thinktank with close links to the Bush administration, offered the payments for articles that emphasise the shortcomings of a report from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Travel expenses and additional payments were also offered.

The UN report was written by international experts and is widely regarded as the most comprehensive review yet of climate change science. It will underpin international negotiations on new emissions targets to succeed the Kyoto agreement, the first phase of which expires in 2012. World governments were given a draft last year and invited to comment.

The AEI has received more than $1.6m from ExxonMobil and more than 20 of its staff have worked as consultants to the Bush administration. Lee Raymond, a former head of ExxonMobil, is the vice-chairman of AEI's board of trustees.

more...


The people are criminals!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kerry testimony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrafty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good. This is important.
A critical mass of Americans is finally ready to do something about global warming, which means it's time to DO SOMETHING. Not part of something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mloutre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Global Warming" is highly over-rated.
I mean, it's not like it affects the entire future of our planet or anything.

Personally, I'd much rather see politicians focusing on giving more tax breaks to the uber-rich and legalizing drilling for oil in ANWR instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC