Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Iraq National Intelligence Estimate Released

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:58 AM
Original message
BREAKING: Iraq National Intelligence Estimate Released

BREAKING: Iraq National Intelligence Estimate Released

The key judgments of the long-delayed Iraq National Intelligence Estimate have been released. Read them HERE. Below, some important findings:

Civil war “accurately describes key elements of the Iraqi conflict,” though it “does not adequately capture the complexity of the conflict”:

The Intelligence Community judges that the term “civil war” does not adequately capture the complexity of the conflict in Iraq, which includes extensive Shia-on-Shia violence, al-Qa’ida and Sunni insurgent attacks on Coalition forces, and widespread criminally motivated violence. Nonetheless, the term “civil war” accurately describes key elements of the Iraqi conflict, including the hardening of ethno-sectarian identities, a sea change in the character of the violence, ethno-sectarian mobilization, and population displacements.


Iran is “not likely to be a major driver of violence or the prospects for stability”:

Iraq’s neighbors influence, and are influenced by, events within Iraq, but the involvement of these outside actors is not likely to be a major driver of violence or the prospects for stability because of the self-sustaining character of Iraq’s internal sectarian dynamics. Nonetheless, Iranian lethal support for select groups of Iraqi Shia militants clearly intensifies the conflict in Iraq.


The overall security situation “will continue to deteriorate” in next 12-18 months”

Iraqi society’s growing polarization, the persistent weakness of the security forces and the state in general, and all sides’ ready recourse to violence are collectively driving an increase in communal and insurgent violence and political extremism. Unless efforts to reverse these conditions show measurable progress during the term of this Estimate, the coming 12 to 18 months, we assess that the overall security situation will continue to deteriorate at rates comparable to the latter part of 2006.


“Rapid withdrawal” of U.S. forces would likely lead to a “significant increase in the scale and scope of sectarian conflict in Iraq”:

Coalition capabilities, including force levels, resources, and operations, remain an essential stabilizing element in Iraq. If Coalition forces were withdrawn rapidly during the term of this Estimate, we judge that this almost certainly would lead to a significant increase in the scale and scope of sectarian conflict in Iraq, intensify Sunni resistance to the Iraqi Government, and have adverse consequences for national reconciliation.


Snip from above:

Unless efforts to reverse these conditions show measurable progress during the term of this Estimate, the coming 12 to 18 months, we assess that the overall security situation will continue to deteriorate at rates comparable to the latter part of 2006.

Snip...

If Coalition forces were withdrawn rapidly during the term of this Estimate, we judge that this almost certainly would lead to a significant increase in the scale and scope of sectarian conflict in Iraq...

Term of this estimate is now the catch phrase. Summary: If the U.S. stays the course with Bush's policy, nothing will change and the situation will worsen. Rapidly? Stabilizing force?

Think Progress:

Iraqi civilian deaths hit monthly high.“Iraqi officials said on Thursday that nearly 2,000 civilians had died in January, a new monthly high that suggests that a crackdown by the government of prime minister Nouri al-Maliki against militias has failed to yield any immediate results.”

Solution: Change course and withdraw the troops.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh it yielded results, just bad ones.
Maliki is learning first hand what happens when he trusts bush and follows his advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bottom line: Murtha and Kerry/Feingold bill was right and everyone voting against it was WRONG.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep. AND, Kerry's analysis has been completely right, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Sometimes I just want to scream! Kerry did say, they got 12 signatures and
that time would bring more Senators over to their side. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yep, and it's still "right."
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Playing politics with
war: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3091120&mesg_id=3091120">here and http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3091648&mesg_id=3091648">here.


"Presidents and politicians may worry about losing face, or
losing votes, or losing legacy; it is time to think about
young Americans and innocent civilians who are losing their lives." – Senator John Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here is the TPMmuckrakers' take:
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002469.php

Well, it says the only solution to the problem is a political one; however, it says that solution is unlikely:

The Sunnis remain "unwilling to accept minority status" and believe the Shiite majority is a stalking horse for Iran. The Shiites remain "deeply insecure" about their hold on power, meaning that the Shiite leadership views U.S.-desired compromises -- on oil, federalism and power-sharing -- as a threat to its position.

And on Bush's surge?:

...even if violence is diminished, given the current winner-take-all attitude and sectarian animosities infecting the political scene, Iraqi leaders will be hard pressed to achieve sustained political reconciliation in the time frame of this Estimate.



And on Iran:

Iraq's neighbors are "not likely to be a major driver of violence or the prospects for stability because of the self-sustaining character of Iraq's internal sectarian dynamics."

So stop blaming Iran, Mr. Bush. I think this will be helpful in averting war with Iran (maybe).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. General Clark's been calling for a political solution since
September 2002.

What took them so long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You mean '03, right? Saddam was still in power in 9/02, and
his brutal regime was why there was no infighting between Sunnis/Shi'ites. Because any fighting was immediately quashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Blame the intelligence agencies...blame Joe Wilson...blame Valerie Plame...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Did the case for invading Iran just quietly crumble?
"Iran is “not likely to be a major driver of violence or the prospects for stability"

Then again, it could be said that the case for "cut and run" is also weakened? In spite of the fact that Democrats are not advising that we do. You can bet we'll hear this talking point from the RW media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why should we trust the "intelligence" report THIS TIME when
it was so wrong before the Iraq invasion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC