Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jeezh. Fox New Poll has Bush at 38% - up 3 from their last poll.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 09:06 AM
Original message
Jeezh. Fox New Poll has Bush at 38% - up 3 from their last poll.
Edited on Sat Feb-03-07 09:07 AM by leftyladyfrommo
Newsweek had him at 30 last week.

I just looked out on http://www.pollingreport.com.

Fox always has the most interesting of all the polls. I think they just call Republicans for their numbers.

After the awful week this adm. has had in the media and the reports and the hearings I would think that Bush and Cheney would be in the negative numbers by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's Faux. Always good for a relaxing departure from reality. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, cuz...oh, wait, you said Fox? All righty then.
BTW, it makes no sense to compare numbers on different polls. For all we know, the previous Faux poll had him at 40. Or not - but who cares? It's faux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. OTOH, if * is polling only 40% from Republicans...
Edited on Sat Feb-03-07 09:17 AM by mark11727
...imagine what his numbers are for the REST of the country. Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. hey fox...pink pigs fly ..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. But actually, he thought as he re-adjusted the Ministry of Plenty's figures, it was not even forgery
It was merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another. Most of the material that you were dealing with had no connexion with anything in the real world, not even the kind of connexion that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version. A great deal of the time you were expected to make them up out of your head. For example, the Ministry of Plenty's forecast had estimated the output of boots for the quarter at one-hundred-and-forty-five million pairs. The actual output was given as sixty-two millions. Winston, however, in rewriting the forecast, marked the figure down to fifty-seven millions, so as to allow for the usual claim that the quota had been overfulfilled. In any case, sixty-two millions was no nearer the truth than fifty-seven millions, or than one-hundred-and-forty-five millions. Very likely no boots had been produced at all. Likelier still, nobody knew how many had been produced, much less cared. All one knew was that every quarter astronomical numbers of boots were produced on paper, while perhaps half the population of Oceania went barefoot. And so it was with every class of recorded fact, great or small. Everything faded away into a shadow-world in which, finally, even the date of the year had become uncertain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. 1984 or one of Bush's handpicked experts own journal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. They probably increased it to the top number within the margin of error. I don't think
Edited on Sat Feb-03-07 10:14 AM by kikiek
it sounds like a real bump. Just playing with numbers. Who believes anything Fox puts out or says other than the sheep they shepard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC