Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rude Pundit: Hey, Connecticut, Thanks For Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:39 PM
Original message
The Rude Pundit: Hey, Connecticut, Thanks For Lieberman
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 12:55 PM by meegbear
Really, if you think about it, Connecticut's usefulness to the nation at large was probably sealed back in September of 1781. That'd be when Benedict Arnold led British forces into New London and burned that town down, seizing Fort Griswold and it supplies. Oh, and then Arnold's men slaughtered dozens of the soldiers who had defended the fort. When a man turns on his own nation, his own state (for, indeed, Arnold was born in Norwich), the son of a bitch is gonna turn with all the viciousness and self-righteousness of a drunk preacher at a whorehouse.

Right now, there's only one thing that's stopping Democrats in the Senate from attempting to cut off funding for even an escalation of the war in Iraq, and that thing is named Lieberman. In his goddamned scary article in the New Yorker, Jeffrey Goldberg shows us, through Joe Lieberman's own words and actions, how much depraved power the Independent from Connecticut holds by agreeing to caucus with the Democrats, thus giving them the Senate. Goldberg writes that Lieberman "told me recently that his attachment to the Party is based in some measure on sentiment, and should not necessarily be thought of as eternal...Lieberman was not willing to say whether he would remain a Democrat if the Party cut off funding for the war. 'That would be stunning to me,' he said. 'And very hurtful. And I’d be deeply affected by it. Let’s put it that way.'"

That's code right there, you know, for something along these lines: "Harry Reid can lick my balls while Carl Levin gives me the rim job of his life. One fuckin' step away from what I want and I'm bailin', bitches, so line up, Teddy, Joe, Barack, Pat and the rest of you, 'cause my dick ain't gonna suck itself."

Being an "independent Democrat" apparently gives Lieberman license to cozy up to the President, who himself spent a good deal of time in Connecticut: "So why do I trust President Bush in spite of the mistakes that were made, consequential mistakes? Because having watched him, having talked to him, I believe that he understands the life-and-death struggle we are in with the most deadly and unconventional enemy, Islamic extremism. And that he has shown himself, notwithstanding all these mistakes, willing to go forward with what he believes is right for the security of the country, regardless of what it has done to his popularity." It's sad, in a "let's-unplug-comatose-Grandpa" way, to watch a man debase himself so before fools, to be idolatrous of idiots. But Lieberman goes even a bit further now, musing about a "war-on-terrorism" tax. Which, considering the way Americans feel about the waging of the "war," is kind of like making it official government policy to ass rape you and then give you a bill for the rapist's nice lunch after he's done fucking you. Rapists gotta eat, motherfuckers.

In his floor speech about not allowing debate on the non-binding resolutions in the Senate, Lieberman rightly pointed out, "This resolution is not about Congress taking responsibility. It is the opposite. It is a resolution of irresolution." And while there's no guarantee, of course, that the Senate would actually consider voting to defund or get specific with the funding for the war, the reason actual action isn't even on the table in the Senate is because of the guy who has threatened to give the majority to the Republicans if Democrats want to start "taking responsibility."

So, hey, thanks, Connecticut, for so fearing Ned Lamont and change that you went with the guy who thinks it's worth more blood and bone of the sons and daughters of your state to "stabilize" Iraq, who thinks that George Bush is a fine Commander-in-Chief of those sons and daughters, who thinks you oughta pay more for the privilege of waging this clusterfucked conflict. Lieberman's on the warpath, man; New London oughta be quaking in fear.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com

-------------------------------------

This posting by me was not meant to bash the state of Connecticut or the fine members of DU who are from that state. It was meant to show the activities of Joe Lieberman.

My sincere apologies if you were offended. I thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. And now we see Dan Gerstein's face all over TV as a consultant...
lecturing Dems on getting along with the GOP. I turned of MSNBC when I saw him on today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. the rude one nails it again....
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, trash MY state for this asshat.
:eyes:

Don't trash the right-wing DLC, the Dem senators supporting Lieberman, the Clintons, the Republicans who abandoned Schlesinger, the Dems who promised to campaign with Lamont (but didn't) or the 10-15 DUers who were openly advocating a Lieberman victory.

Somehow it's all Connecticut's fault, even though a good 50% of voters demonstrated they didn't want Holy Joe in office any more.

BTW, are any of these "DUers" still around? I'd like to see them explain themselves now. I imagine they are all gone, having done the dirty work they set out to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Those DUers avoid threads like this....
or just call those names who point out their "dirty work" as you say..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm sorry ...
You are correct. I'll put a disclaimer in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, there are some Dems in CT who ought to be ashamed of themselves
for voting for Joe. And now he has all but deserted the state. He must know that even people who voted for him (except for the wingers)now despise him and consider him an enemy of our state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wingers despise him too...they know he's a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. I was wondering that, too.
I remember a fair amount of stalwart Joe support before the elections.

Haven't heard much of that since.

Hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. s/d
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 11:56 PM by file83
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. I once knew a guy, can't remember his name Zo Colollo or something...?
He swore Lieberman was a real Democrat! I sure would like to ask him a few questions.

Wonder where he is now...?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xkenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. If memory serves, only Wes Clark and John Kerry had the courage to campaign fo Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Chris Dodd filmed a commercial with him in West Hartford.
I will remember things like this when I consider voting for Mr. Dodd in the primaries, even if I don't move back to Connecticut by then.

Granted, I will also remember his work with HAVA. Then again, no candidate is perfect, and unless I have other evidence, I'm tempted to give Dodd the benefit of the doubt in guessing that even he didn't know how monstrous HAVA would turn out to be.

But I still hope my man Gore runs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Been thinking about that election yesterday too
True, both party machines propped joementum. That still doesn't let those who voted for him off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Uh, the Democratic Party of the state of CT supported Ned Lamont in the general election.
I don't know how that propped Joe. What am I missing? (I worked for Ned at Lamont hq in the primary and in the general).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. I meant the Schumer machine - allowing Joe to keep chairmanship&brag
about it & other little niceties.
I know there were a lot of good people fighting in Ct - many more than we had in NY for Tasini...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. THat really kills me too. Schumer is out of touch.
He needs a brain enema. Or something.

Man, we've got some serious house cleaning to do in our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeh, I'm sure lieman
would be goddamn "deeply affected by it"..fucking putz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. At this point, I don't think Joe would be affected by anything.
He is just a walking ego stick.

I cannot believe that anyone in our state believes in him any more. I cannot even speak about him anymore without getting rabid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thanks for trying
to get his lying ass outta there in Nov, 2006!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nah, no offense. I was pissed off then, I become increasingly so
each day.

I just pray and eagerly await the day in 2008 when we gain 3-4 more senate seats (at least!), and Joe? Becomes completely and thoroughly inconsequential.

He can start dating his ignomious retirement at that point, I think. No chance in hell he'll be elected again.

And those new buddies of his? The ones he's counting on to include him in their GOP campaigns? Yeah, like hell they will, Joey.

He's screwed. He just doesn't know it yet.

And it will be a true pleasure to watch him on the ride down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Love the Rudeness.
Hate the Connecticut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. so does the Rude Pundit blame all of NYC for Guilliani?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Of course he would - why the hell wouldn't he?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. Is there a recall provision in Connecticut?
Can the people of Connecticut make things right and pull that rat out of office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. No offense taken.
I'm deeply ashamed that this filth, neocon represents my state. We had so much to work with yet the dumb ass voters here accepted LIEberMe's LIES and blatant distortion of reality.

I did what I could. We all did. At least LIEberMe is no longer part of the Democratic Party and while we need his puke ass for control, we can kick him to the curb in 2008 when we pick up more Senate seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. I hate that Joe is from my state but....
I don't think some people realize that CT is really diverse and both conservative and liberal at the same time. The problem is Connecticut is like three states in one. There are the REALLY rich parts like where I grew up, in Cheshire. Doctors, lawyers, ect all live there and it doesn't even look like the place my parents grew up or even where I grew up and I was only born 31 years ago. There are McMansions everywhere in the towns like Cheshire. Then there are really snobby rich towns like Westport, Greenwhich, Avon, etc. Then of course you have cities like Hartford, New Haven, Waterbury that are so poor. Its more extreme then in other states because the rich are so rich and the poor are so poor. I live in the working class/middle class town of Terryville. We kind of get lost here. The rich people or those in rich towns vote for Lieberman because while he is not ultra conservative he is considered a "moderate" and both Dems and Repubs in these towns will vote for him. The cities won't really vote for him but he can take some vote from middle class towns like the one I live in because some people stupidly believe that because Joe faught for the Groton sub base he is for working class folk. It really is a shame that we don't have Lamont who ironically was from a rich town, Greenwhich. My parents voted for Joe as they are independents who vote all Repub. Joe was really the Repub candidate in this race (Alan who?) but some Dems and Dem-leaning independents don't know enough of the real Bush-kissing Joe to realize what they were doing. At least we have Chris Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC