DU a poll: Senate should be allowed to debate a resolution disagreeing with W's surge for Iraq?

[Omaha Steve]

Bottom of page: http://www.omaha.com/

Do you think the Senate should be allowed to debate a resolution disagreeing with President Bush's troop surge for Iraq?

Current vote #'s:

• Yes.(57)

• No.(35)

• I have no opinion.(1)

[unhappycamper]

1. Current results: Yes, 73 No,43

• Yes. (73)
• No. (43)
• I have no opinion. (1)

[wakeme2008]

2. kick nt

[Sherman A1]

3. Done

85 to 43 now.....

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

4. Yes 97 No 46

Those 46 clowns have no notion of how this country is supposed to work, do they?

[bonito]

5. Done

[donheld]

6. Done with pleasure

:bounce:

[RC]

7. The 'NO's do not want a debate because...?

Maybe there is really no reason of any 'Surge'?

If we really want to 'Support our Troops', we would bring them home from the killing fields we created to where they belong.
Get our National Guard back home where they can do what they were formed to do, Help the individual states with natural disasters and do PR work?

[ElsewheresDaughter]

8. done....here's why no debate because...

the repukes only want debate simply to stall/stop (kill the clock with resolution after resolution)the vote until it's too late and the surged troops are already there....they are giving bush the time he needs and asked them for to accomplish this.

vote NO debate

[atreides1]

9. Currently

• Yes.
(240)

• No.
(111)

• I have no opinion.
(11)

[Omaha Steve]

10. Up to the moment #'s from this Republican paper!

• Yes. (904)

• No. (385)

• I have no opinion. (31)