Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Speculation on why Joementum has not switched parties.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:28 PM
Original message
Speculation on why Joementum has not switched parties.
First, this is nothing but idle wondering....

Why hasn't Joe switched Parties? He got a clear message from Democrats in the primaries that he's not their choice and there is a debt due Republicans for rescuing him in the GE. If he flipped, I'm sure he'd be able to cut a deal for whatever hi-profile committee chair he wanted, what would Bush and the Republicans have to lose? Joe would still be in the limelight. So why hasn't he done it?

Maybe he knows that 2008 will relegate him to the backench if he did this...but that could happen anyway in the next Congress, particularly if we get a strong increase in Senate Democrats.

I'm betting that there is at least 1 Republican, maybe more, that would neutralize Joe's switch...as soon as Joe anounces, they announce their decision to switch. Such a change would then make Joe's leverage completely moot.

He's got the best deal he can get now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe it's his senority
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Could the voters of Connecticut recall "Holy Joe" from Washington?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No. CT does not have recall legislation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I'm certain that if wanted to switch he could easily negotiate a chairmanship
The fact is that Lieberman would be more out of place in the Republican party than he is in ours. I know that's not a popular observation around her. But if you remove the Iraq, Israel, and Patriot Act votes, he probably supports the president less than 10% of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think he wants to keep the threat of a switch hanging over everyone's
heads; more leverage that way.

It's hard to put into words just how much I hate that goatfucker...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Sir, that comment is an insult to all goatfuckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's what I think it is too
If he switches he would be in the minority after '08 and he can see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. The threat of switching gives him the most power.
If the Democrats were smart, they'd just call his bluff. He's basically holding them hostage as things stand. They shouldn't allow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. joe knows
the democratic majority is going to be bigger in 08. He's a selfish prick and wants to keep his options open. Having some conservatism in his dna he doesn't mind kissing whichever ass happens to be in power in hopes of a nice committee post. Kissing gop ass has not been very effective lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because he's getting camera time and kudos from Bush
He's the Cons' Icon for all things "bi-partisan" as far as Bush's Eternal War goes. If and when that stops, he'll switch to bring himself back to being the talk of the town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Turncoats are hardly trusted anywhere.
If he switched, then Dems lose the Senate. There is no guarantee that the Repubs would treat him any better than the Dems. On the issues, Joe has more in common with middle-of-the-road Democrats than with rightists like Delay and Hastert. Also, Joe would lose whatever chairmanships he has by switching, and if there is any part of Joe that simply is in it for the power, then that part of him would speak to him and tell him not to give up that power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. How about "He wants to be re-elected"?
If he switches to GOP, he gets killed in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. He likes the attention he gets
Repubs will always be enticing him to come over, Dems will always be enticing him to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why not just start his own party?...
because he seems to be a party of one at this point anyway. Any ideas? How about the Joepublican Party? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I think even his "own" party has kicked him out.
Connecticut for Lieberman. Run by John Orman, who wants LIEberman out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. stalemate
The committee that he chairs is Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The ranking repub on that Committee is Susan Collins. In order to give joe the chairmanship of that committee the repubs would have to toss Collins overboard. If they did, she just might switch herself, giving the Dems the majority.

So basically, you have a stalemate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. He's seen the writing on the wall
and the 22 Republican Senators that are up for reelection in 2008 and decided if he switches now, he gets a year and a half in the majority, but a generation in the minority.

The Repuke party is going the way of the Whigs. Look at the bloviating about this plane for the 3RD in line to the presidency. If that's all they've got, they know their screwed. They're grasping at straws and bailing the Titanic with a thimble.

Oh and by the way...Just because Repukes don't like her, does not change the fact that Nancy Pelosi is 3RD in line for the Presidency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC