Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Bill Clinton is the most influential man alive today"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:28 PM
Original message
"Bill Clinton is the most influential man alive today"
There was no saxophone. But former President Clinton still rocked the house at the Nokia Theatre -- drawing several standing ovations -- Thursday night.

The 42nd president spoke for more than an hour to a crowd of around 4,000, some wearing "Arkansas" T-shirts, others carrying mugs of beer and carafes of wine, about globalization, economics, healthcare and war.

When Clinton saw the crowd that turned out to listen to him on a weeknight, he laughed.

"It's quite obvious that we have 90 percent of the Democrats in North Texas here," he said.

"Any still out there are probably in danger. I feel like I should let you go."

Clinton was introduced to the crowd and shepherded through a prepared question-and-answer session by Danny Eaton, senior vice president of AEG Live, which owns and manages the theater.

"Bill Clinton is the most influential man alive today," Eaton told the crowd.

http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/nation/16660913.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Eeep
Obviously there isn't much interest in Bill Clinton these days. The Nokia Theatre in Grand Prarie holds 6300 people. 2300 empty seats for the "most influential man alive today"

I think people are losing interest in "The Clintons" and the eqivocations that brought us to where we are today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Losing interest in the Clintons?
Yeah, that's why Hillary is leading all the national Dem polls for the nomination. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL
She is barely ahead a year off based on name recognition alone. Thank God she has 0 chance of actually winning it. Seeing 2300 empty seats for a Clinton speech tells me all I need to know about the influence of this family and I, for one, am glad we don't have to deal with finger in the wind politics from the dems for much longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL
She is barely ahead a year off

by 20% or more in most polls...

based on name recognition alone...

Whose name? Clinton. How's that for influential?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
39. I guess you like two family oligarchies
running this country.

I guess I don't have any choice but to line up and be submissive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. For a crowd of 4,000 people to come out on a Thurs night is quite a feat!
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 02:53 PM by Tellurian
"Bill Clinton is the most influential man alive today," Eaton told the crowd.

Later he called Clinton a "national treasure" as the crowd applauded and an audience member called out "rock 'n' roll."

The topic of his wife, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, and her potential presidential bid came up briefly twice, but he quashed talk of the issue.

When he asked who should be responsible to fix the world's problems, a member of the audience shouted "Hillary" and many applauded.
"If I say anything about that, someone will file a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission and she'll have to pay my trip down here," Clinton chuckled.

Among Clinton's opinions:

Globalization and how today's society is unequal and unstable.

War and how expensive it is. "I'm not saying we should never fight," Clinton said. "But we've got to go into the world with more partners and fewer enemies. Then when you fight your enemies, you have more partners."

Healthcare and how not enough people in the United States have access to affordable health insurance. "We need healthcare reform," he said. "We need to save money and cover everyone."

Clean energy and energy efficiency.

"If I were a young person going into business today, I would get into clean energy and I would make a fortune," he said. "I'd leave all the doubters in the dust."

Clinton is a popular public speaker, at times earning as much as $350,000 an appearance.

Officials didn't say how much he earned for his two-hour appearance in North Texas. In 2005 Clinton made 43 speeches in more than a dozen countries, according to Senate disclosure forms his wife filed last year.

At the end of his prepared speech, he called on the audience, and all who live across the country, to do what they can to make the world a better place.

"I think the 21st century will be the most exciting, interesting time in history," he said.

"We need healthcare reform. We need to save money and cover everyone."



...President Clinton is the essence of gravitas-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yet Al Gore has sold out 10000 person arenas (edit to fix capacity)
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 02:58 PM by Milo_Bloom
...On Weeknights

Clinton = Yesterday's news, yesterday's 'finger in the wind' politics.

only selling 2/3 of a TINY place like Nokia... is all the info we need.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Laughable and whose we? Do not presume to speak for me! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. No, I speak for the masses
While Al Gore is selling out 10,000 seat Arenas in "red state Idaho" (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/01/23/huffpos-melinda-henneber_n_39362.html)

Clinton cannot sell out a tiny 6300 person theater in the far more densely populated Dallas Fort Worth area of Texas. (http://www.nokialivedfw.com/venueoverview.asp) "With its’ 6,350-indoor seating capacity"

The Clintons are yesterday's news now. Its time to look at the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Didn't you read the OP article...Clinton wasn't talking about Global Warming!
Thats where you messed up!

Good on Al, though- Even Texas is aware of the Bush threat to the World!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. In Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. No, In Idaho, even more impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushclipper Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. so, how much redder is Idaho than Texas. And what arenas?
Links?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Here are links
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 03:33 PM by Milo_Bloom
While Al Gore is selling out 10,000 seat Arenas in "red state Idaho" (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/01/23/huffpos-melinda-henneber_n_39362.html )

Here are 2004 election results from Idaho
http://www.idsos.state.id.us/ELECT/RESULTS/2004/general/cnty_pres.htm

Bush 68% to Kerry's 30%

in Texas?
(http://www.uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?f=0&year=2004&fips=48)

Bush 61% to Kerry's 38%

So, Idaho is REDDER than Texas and Al Gore could sell 10,000 seats in under 5 hours... and that was to see something they could rent on DVD.

Clinton cannot sell out a tiny 6300 person theater in the far more densely populated Dallas Fort Worth area of Texas. (http://www.nokialivedfw.com/venueoverview.asp ) "With its’ 6,350-indoor seating capacity"

He didn't even come close, only 4000 seats sold.

Tickets were even selling for far under face value on ebay (http://cgi.ebay.com/2-Bill-Clinton-Tickets-on-2-8-07-in-Grand-Prairie-TX_W0QQitemZ140083586861QQihZ004QQcategoryZ16122QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)

If you don't think this shows the general feelings of people towards Clintonian politics... well, good luck with the Clinton campaign and don't be too disappointed when she loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. links to arenas Gore sold out in Idaho?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. See Post above for reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Barely ahead?
What polls are you looking at? And if it's all about "name recognition," why isn't Edwards close to the lead? He has the same name recognition among Dems as she does.

It's patently ridiculous to extrapolate some sort of "trend" from one unfilled venue (I'm taking you at your word that it does hold more than 6,000) in a heavily red state.

But, hey, if that's enough to convince you HRC isn't going to win the nomination, believe what you want. You must be thinking the anti-Hillary sentiment on DU means she's disliked among Dems as a whole. Big mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Yes, Barely ahead
She isn't close to 50% and DEAN had far far greater leads, where he was OVER 50% in Iowa and New Hampshire and we all know how that turned out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. 20% + is much more than "barely ahead."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. 20% is nothing, when you aren't cracking 50
You have only to look at history to see the truth of that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushclipper Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. I have only to look at simple math to rebut that statement.
Hillary wins even if she leads by 1%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. You have some historical examples, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Yes, already gave you one
But let's look at who was unbeatable in Iowa this time in the 2004 election.

Dick Gephardt with Lieberman close behind. Hmm, that held up well.

You will find a trend if you look at history... unless there is a SITTING PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT, the early leader, almost NEVER WINS.

So, I am glad Clinton has a lead at this point, b/c history tells us, she has no chance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. delete
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 02:50 PM by lancdem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Funny how virtually every single country in the world would disagree with you
Bush* who is despised and/or disrespected throughout the world by virtually every single country, friend or foe can't travel anywhere without an entire battle group standing by to protect him, while Clinton on the other hand is adored and respected throughout and people flock to see and hear him. No other politician of note has that amount of respoect throughout the world. Even countries we consider unfriendly respect Clinton for his intelligence and general bearing...Your response is "so American"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. I've heard Clinton described as 'the most popular man in the world'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. For those that continue to deny Hillary has any strength in the party...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
45. exactly
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Too little information.
How much advance time was there for his appearance? What was the weather like? How much were the tickets? How well advertised was his appearance? How red is the area? Did the organizers want to limit availabiltiy of the tickets to 4000, to make the venue more manageable?

There are a lot of factors that could influence a low turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. I can answer most of those questions
Tickets went on sale in January and ticket prices ranged from 175-->39.50. The Venue is in the Dallas/Fort Worth area and the event was heavily promoted and advertised.

We aren't talking about TURNOUT, so weather isn't that important. They never sold out the venue, or even came close. You could buy 39.50 tickets up until the night before and tickets that originally cost 350 for a pair were selling for 150 and lower on ebay, because there was no demand to see the event.

Al Gore, on the other hand, sold out a 10,000+ person arena in under 5 hours from the time it went onsale.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, he is the most influential Democrat, and what he says carries weight with alot of
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 02:34 PM by blm
lawmakers and the American public. His advice to Democratic lawmakers is almost always taken. I, personally, think the motives behind his advisements should be given greater scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I know at least 3 who agree.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/1041

And with great influence comes great responsibility.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe not the MOST influential, but VERY influential.
And he's earned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Can you expand with examples? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. ....well, there's obviously John Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Can you not respond to me?
If it's going to be stuff like this? Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. Jimi Hendrix
but you probably think he's not alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Bush and Cheney, unfortunately. Their influence may not be good, but,
as President and VP, they are the most influential people in the world.

But Clinton is one of the most influential, this is true, and I can understand how a supporter would call him the most influential person in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. No matter where he goes, the man is a rock star the world over
It's just incredible how he's still so revered all across the country and the world. Few people have that kind of magic like he does. Muhammad Ali is another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm just damn glad he's on our side of the aisle.
The dichotomy between how BC was treated versus Junior during the Pope's funeral was really striking. As I recall BC was mobbed adoringly and Junior was booed.

Also, when BC climbed up in Chris Wallace's grill on the Fox Noise Channel, it gave a signal to Dems of what to do to win; he was right and we did.

There is no question Bill Clinton is a force of nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I love how he told off that dipshit, whatever the fuck his name is. a while back
on one of the talk shows, I think a Fox channel one. If only the rest of our people would show spine like the Clintons do. Some do, but not enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Most of them must have no idea what a turn-on that is. People flock to guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
30. hyperbolic and meaningless at the same time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. Did Clinton first use the "strong and wrong" words in 2002? What if...about Iraq.
I thought they were earlier. Sometimes I think what if he had used his powerful influence over the party to say that Iraq was no danger...instead of saying we had to look so strong.

http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030217&s=greider

The ex-President speaks out frequently on grand policy, though his speech to the DLC conference in December 2002 was heavy with whining about slights he has endured from the right's "destruction machine" and the "docile establishment press." Clinton's agenda for the party sounds, not surprisingly, like warmed-over Clintonism--a familiar mix of facile evasions of blame and tactical suppression of principled positions that would draw a stark contrast with the Republicans. Democrats, for instance, must be pro-war, even tougher than Bush on national security. "The last point I want to make is we've got to be strong," he declared. "When we look weak in a time where people feel insecure, we lose. When people feel uncertain, they'd rather have somebody who's strong and wrong than somebody who's weak and right." Actually, this was also the first point he made in his hourlong speech, and he repeated it many times throughout. Supporting the war is insufficient, Clinton warned. "I approve of what's being done in Iraq now and the way it's being done, but it's not enough," he said."


What if we had just been right about Iraq? What if all those lives had not been lost so we could look strong. :shrug:

Relying on Clinton advisors about the war...too much of it?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
44. in the long run, what Al Gore is doing will make him far more influential than Clinton . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC