Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gates: the second carrier group was meant to “reassure our allies as well as to senda signal....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:29 PM
Original message
Gates: the second carrier group was meant to “reassure our allies as well as to senda signal....
Edited on Sat Feb-10-07 07:30 PM by Flabbergasted
that we’ve been in the Persian Gulf for decades and we intend to stay there.”

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C02%5C11%5Cstory_11-2-2007_pg4_7


US tries to ease tone in Iran dispute

* Washington says Tehran ‘digging a hole’ in nuclear dispute

SEVILLE: US Defence Secretary Robert Gates on Friday dismissed suggestions that Washington had raised its rhetoric against Iran, saying the Bush administration was trying to soften the tone as tensions with Tehran climb.

“My impression frankly in the last few weeks is that there’s been an effort in Washington to tone down everybody else,” he said.

“I don’t know how many times the president, Secretary (of State Condoleezza) Rice and I have had to repeat that we have no intention of attacking Iran.”

Gates’ comments to reporters at a NATO meeting in Spain came a day after Iranian officials said they tested missiles capable of hitting warships in the Gulf and threatened to strike US interests if Iran was attacked.

Gates, appointed in December, has regularly warned against attacking Iran, but some defense analysts have pointed to signs such as the addition of a second US Navy carrier group in the Gulf.

On Friday, Gates said the second carrier group was meant to “reassure our allies as well as to send a signal that we’ve been in the Persian Gulf for decades and we intend to stay there.”

“I think these are fairly modest statements,” he said.

Tensions have flared between the United States and Iran in recent months. The United States and others say Iran is seeking a nuclear weapons capability under the cover of a nuclear energy program, but Tehran disputes the claim.

US officials also say Iran is fanning violence in Iraq by giving technology and other support to Shi’ite groups. Gates said there was some evidence Iran was the source of technology for a type of sophisticated roadside bomb.

“I’m just frankly not specifically certain myself of the details but I understand there is pretty good evidence tying (the bomb technology) to the Iranians,” he said.

‘Digging a hole’: A senior US official said on Friday that Iran is “digging a hole deeper and deeper for itself” in the international dispute over its atomic energy program.

“Iran seems to be determined to further its isolation internationally on this issue of nuclear weapons,” Nicholas Burns, US undersecretary of state for political affairs, told reporters in Buenos Aires.

He said only a small handful of countries in the world support Iran, which is under United Nations sanctions that bar the transfer of sensitive material and know-how to its nuclear program.

However, he said that the United States stands by its offer of June last year to negotiate with Iran if that country suspended enrichment at its underground plant at Natanz. He reiterated that the United States would suspend sanctions during the talks.

The United States has put economic sanctions on Iran and is building up forces in the Gulf but says it is committed to diplomacy and has no intention of invading Iran. agencies


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. How many carrier
groups do we have in striking distance of Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 2 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm no military expert but
is two enough to attack Iran. I would think more would be needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. More than the number of "Allies". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. nobody...
"The United States has put economic sanctions on Iran and is building up forces in the Gulf but says it is committed to diplomacy and has no intention of invading Iran".

Nobody I have seen is speculating an invasion.... Just really really really big fireworks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Reassure our allies = Obey the orders of Saudi Arabia
If you don't believe me, go back and do a little googling on Dick Cheney's last unexpected visit summoning to that locale. He got his marching orders, and we were off to the races.

Hey, they're the ones who have their hands on the spigot. And they jawbone US, not the other way around--no matter what the Monkey said in the Gore debates...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep...BTW I've appreciated reading what you have to say..
You seem quite knowledgable and Passionate....

Just an observation. Nothing more.


:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I spent a few years over in that end of the world
I often think it would be nice if these nitwits in the administration had at least one or two people who actually had a familiarity with the region, the culture, the history, and so on! We wouldn't have Dunceboy getting remedial lessons into basics like the fact that there are many branches of Islam, and on the history of the Shi'a/Sunni split YEARS into his foolish little war...

Too much to hope, though, I'm afraid. The litmus test is not knowledge, sadly--it's party loyalty. And we're all paying for that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. iran probably has enough supersonic SilkWorm's to sink the whole fleet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC