|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Tiggeroshii (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 05:48 AM Original message |
Poll question: Primary Poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 05:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Why do we have one of these every day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 08:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. I think it's like a morning rooster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 05:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. I'm writing in Al Gore . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just-plain-Kathy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
3. Kick & recommend..to keep it out there....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larry in KC (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
4. I DISAGREE... without CLARK, you've got some 'splainin' to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bklyncowgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
5. Richardson--he has experience and did not vote for the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuartrida (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Richardson would be great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
6. Clark! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
8. Won't vote w/o Clark n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. Dodd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Dumb omissions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dracos (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
10. KICK & Recommend 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
11. Well, this at least should be explained... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
12. How can you include Sharpton and exclude Clark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
14. No Clark - no vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
15. Gore or Clark, in the this poll I voted Obama n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
16. I want Gore but if he isn't an option then I pick Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SanFranciscoValues (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. He isn't an option because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-13-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
19. It's a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC