Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill to Audit the US Intelligence Community

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Doondoo Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 06:29 AM
Original message
Bill to Audit the US Intelligence Community
Today, Representatives Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Henry Cueller (D-TX) and Christopher Carney (D-PA) introduced the "Intelligence Community Audit Act of 2007." This legislation reaffirms the authority of the Comptroller General of the United States and head of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct for Congress audits and evaluations of the intelligence community - including audits and evaluations pertaining to financial transactions, programs, and information sharing and other activities. It also prescribes the security procedures that GAO must follow in conducting audits for congressional intelligence oversight committees of intelligence sources and methods, or covert actions.

With passage of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, the federal government now encompasses 19 distinct components that have intelligence responsibilities. Ensuring that these components - which range from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to the Department of Homeland Security to the Department of Treasury - are cooperating and performing their missions effectively is critical to our national security and winning the war on terrorism.

This risk to oversight became apparent last year shortly after GAO released a report on federal government policies relating to the sharing of terrorism-related and sensitive but unclassified (SBU) information (GAO-06-385). Specifically, the DNI declined to comment on a draft version of the report because it considered GAO's work in this non-sensitive area a "review of intelligence activities" that was "beyond GAO's purview."

"I was greatly disturbed by the Director of National Intelligence's (DNI) refusal to contribute its fair share to the GAO report," Rep. Thompson stated. "This bill makes clear that the DNI cannot evade Congressional oversight by lumping the sharing of unclassified information and other non-sensitive matters together with the kinds of intelligence activities that understandably must be held to a stricter standard."


http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0702/S00189.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anything that would gain some control over the 'intelligence' community is a step forward.
I would like to see the American people reign in the Pentagon even more. We have to stop the unfettered growth of the military. I think their budget, including their wars of choice, should be capped at $500 billion a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC