|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:05 PM Original message |
Poll question: Does it annoy you when people threaten to vote third party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. I voted yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Not in your life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. I hereby certify that you are a member of the liberal elite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. Our 08 field is awesome. Plenty of talent, deep bench. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:05 AM Response to Reply #2 |
50. There's no antiwar candidate with a real shot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. when the threat is electoral extortion, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. The counting of the votes or lack of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the other one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. Third parties are extremely important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
37. I totally disagree with you. nader got 97,000 votes in florida in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #37 |
48. Here we go again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:41 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. I'm not necessarily anti-nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #53 |
97. But you don't have a point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dean Martin (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:21 AM Response to Reply #37 |
52. How do you know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:41 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. are you seriously suggesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dean Martin (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:56 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. They more likely would have not voted at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 02:25 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. I am positive that gore would have found the 500 votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dean Martin (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 02:28 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Not if the GW camp rigged the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 02:33 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. there is a margin big enough to be cheat proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dumak (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
46. plurality voting system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #46 |
67. But what if you really HATE your party's nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #67 |
83. In almost every circumstance if you look hard enough there's reason to vote for one over the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. No. If we won't have an opposition party, then we'll have to find one. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. How is having only two parties different from having a handful of oil or media conglomerates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
9. Is having Bush as pResident annoying? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. Deleted message |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. what annoys me is that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. but it's a constant balancing act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. electoral politics is one balancing act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #12 |
64. Perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. Not if they are republicans. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. Its their right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. doesn't bother me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. 'It's a bit odd to read on a website entitled "Democratic" Underground.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. You've got that right, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 07:22 PM Response to Reply #23 |
43. They are anybody else, I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
17. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
20. Not at all, it is their right to vote any way they wish. What does annoy me is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
22. There is nothing in the Constitution that mentions political parties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doondoo (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
24. I have voted third party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
25. What DOES annoy me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
26. If I consider myself a true democrat (small d democrat) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seldona (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
27. I voted yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
28. yes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #28 |
68. While I agree with Atomic Kitten to a degree: if you're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #68 |
80. Since I know the personal reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #68 |
81. on a local level I could understand voting against someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
29. I vote no, each to his own but I do try to dissuade them, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
manic expression (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
30. Not to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. And you hang out here because...? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
manic expression (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. This site is also for 'other progressives' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Did you read the sentence after that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
manic expression (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I support progressive ideals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jagger69 (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. It's a contradiction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
manic expression (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:52 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Very good point n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
87. Welcome to DU, Jagger69! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #33 |
49. I support progressive Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jagger69 (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
34. Who else will admit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. People have been threatening to vote 3rd Party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:06 AM Response to Reply #34 |
51. I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #34 |
65. I voted for Gene McCarthy (Ind) in 1976 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #34 |
69. I have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #34 |
74. Many Many Times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #34 |
112. Yes; and not just 'at some point' - but the situation is very different in the UK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-18-07 08:20 AM Response to Reply #34 |
126. sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meldroc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
40. Depends. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rep the dems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
41. Yes. In times like these people need to put aside the whole both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirochete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
44. A little bit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
45. The mentally ill should be pitied, not be seen as an annoyance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #45 |
70. Oh that's helpful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. I am listening to WZZO right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. No - I meant that you shouldn't call folks mentally retarded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #72 |
75. I didn't call anyone (or suggest that they were) mentally retarded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pushed To The Left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
47. I voted Yes, but I need to clarify.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmellsLikeDeanSpirit (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
59. I vote no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
60. No, I'm annoyed by Democrats who continue to blame all of their problems on third parties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
61. I think it's perfectly ok to threaten, or to vote, 3rd party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
62. Anyone can vote for anybody, but if I had voted for a third |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
63. I voted yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
66. this poll brilliantly demonstrates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
73. Without IRV a third party is a shot in the head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
76. I'll tell you what annoys me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
77. Yes, because though we should keep to our ideals, we need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
78. Absolutely! Some people are better at pushing buttons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
79. No. The right to vote freely and according to conscience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
82. Ex-Homeless and Hungry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. Don't presume to speak for all of the homeless and hungry, OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. I still work with the homeless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #85 |
95. Yes, actually I do work with the homeless, the poor, the disenfranchised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. Read my apology from Madspirit to MadHound n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. I did, and thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #82 |
104. nevermind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
86. I voted yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
88. Apology to MadHound from Madspirit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #88 |
98. No apology necessary. I fully realize that I'm a heritical Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
89. They annoy me as much as those in the DLC who supported Lieberman's 3rd party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. Lieberman (& supporters)& Nader (& supporters) are peas in a pod. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Dr. Fate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
91. Running 3rd party (Lieberman) voting third party (some DUers) is equally bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Not just Joe's "running"- but those who supported & defended him too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geek_Girl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
100. No I sometimes think about voting third party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Lieberman & his DLC supporters did not just "think" about it- they DID it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuauhtla (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
102. Inside-outside, push-pull |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
103. No; they have the right to vote as they choose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
105. Depends on the context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
106. yes and no, I mean no and yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRH (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
107. To not vote for one of the two major parties ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobaindrain (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
108. yes, definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
109. NO!!!! Absolutely not!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Well, were you ever running, yourself, in any of those elections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 06:51 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. I have more of a "real, legitmiate" desire than Ralph Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 07:23 PM Response to Reply #113 |
114. I agree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. Just keep in mind..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 08:54 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. does it make us even? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-18-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #117 |
121. Well, it means you know some civil people in RL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. Yes it is. Here is your original argument: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #115 |
118. Uh... no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-18-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #118 |
122. Maybe I should have been more clear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demo_Cracker (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
119. Democrats cannot win if they play the blame game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-18-07 12:50 AM Response to Reply #119 |
123. That's right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-17-07 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
120. Neither. This is not a black and white issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-18-07 04:14 AM Response to Original message |
124. Not at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-18-07 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
125. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC