Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republicans used code words to back us into a corner on religion, faith, and values.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:37 PM
Original message
The Republicans used code words to back us into a corner on religion, faith, and values.
I wrote yesterday about how Howard Dean spoke about the way the extremists in this administration had managed to hijack and use real faith and values for their own political purposes. He spoke of it actually as a sort of coup.

I also expressed my fear that our Democrats are going to be very fearful of fighting back against some on the religious right....because they simply do not understand what they are facing.

To survive, our party and its candidates must be able to tell real faith and values and true religion from the false piety and misleading words they have been using on us.

Our Democrats don't seem to understand what they are up against.

Hijacking faith and values.

.."The theft of meaning...of truth and faith and the ability to believe....has been one of the worst things the Republicans have done to the American people. It is time for the Democrats to fight back. We've got to fight fire with fire. Not by cynically co-opting the language of religion for our own purposes, or by blurring the line between church and state, or by aping the self-righteousness of the right wing. But by challenging their charade of virtue with a real politics of meaning."


In his book You Have the Power, 2004, Dean pointed out how the Republicans have used the power of language to get so much power. He mentions Newt Gingrich and Frank Luntz, and how they tapped into this power of words.

But the Republicans didn't only choose their words with care; they perfected the art of twisting them subtly (and not so subtly) to keep their meaning in line with their politics.

"Family values" became code for a right wing crusade against working women and gays and lesbians. Talk of "community" meant communities turned against one another. "Personal Responsiblity" provided cover for irresponsible government practices that stiffed the poor. "Faith" was put to the service of religious bigotry. All of this lofty rhetoric that seemed to play to our best impulses was used to cloak the Republicans' mean-spiritedness and appeal to Americans' worst natures.


He speaks of how an anti-democratic, openly anti-pluralistic, openly theocratic agenda allowed a coup of sorts to happen:

From the 2004 book, You Have the Power, more on this topic.

The Republicans maneuvering brilliantly under the guidance of their language czars, learned how to cloak their ideology---and ideology far more extreme than what most Americans would accept--in words that sounded mainstream."

..."After Gingrich became Speaker, Brock reports in the "Republican Noise Machine", Luntz tutored newly elected Republicans in Congress on how to sell their radical agenda to more socially progressive neocons through careful turns of phrase."

..."The biggest coup of all, bring a team of radical right wing idealogues to the White House under the cover of Compassionate Conservatism.

Democrats and moderate Republicans have woken up and found themselves in an America ruled by people pushing forward intolerant, discriminatory policies....anti-woman, anti-gay, and anti-civil liberties, all in the name of God. The truth is we allowed this to happen by mostly remaining silent about the things that give meaning to people's lives."


To be able to fight effectively, you have to understand your foes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's been a while since I read Gov. Dean's book...I'm going to reread it
Thanks for the great post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I find new stuff in it all the time that I missed before.
I also finished The Citizens' Guide to the Man Who Would be President, the one by the reporters in VT. I recommend it.

I also think that "national security" was a code word, and it is still is. Too many were afraid to be right about Iraq, just had to sound tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. You sure do, madfloridian. You sure do.
Edited on Thu Feb-15-07 10:45 PM by calimary
That's why we must A) be more savvy, and CONSISTENTLY so, about our own use of the language - make it work for US, also; and B) CALL THE BASTARDS when they try to manipulate the verbiage. CALL 'em on it. Ask them exactly what they mean by that. What are they REALLY trying to say? Why do they PUT IT that way - yes, go after the actual mechanics, and if necessary, translate it FOR them, then and there, and help them to see. More importantly - help ANYBODY ELSE within earshot to hear and see, too.

We have to punch 'em in the nose with this, figuratively speaking, and play the game more deftly and shrewdly and with greater cleverness and humor - which is VERY memorable to other ears. Professor George Lakoff's Rockridge Institute in Berkeley, CA, is a great place to start. Also, I believe if yo google frank luntz, you'll find a website of his that spells out different bad-guy strategies, wording-spinning-parsing recommendations, and other analysis and how-to material.

Know your enemy, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Amen to that...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Call them on it right away...don't let it fester.
The situation this week could have been so much different for the bloggers and for Edwards....if our Dems had called Donohue out on his BS no one would have had to have been hurt. But they would have had to stand together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. No problem. I understood them long ago. Not one word they
used fooled me. A pig is always a pig even when its bacon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Personally, I think the "wedge" issues agenda is growing old among the majority
Edited on Thu Feb-15-07 10:50 PM by pinto
of the electorate. The majority. There may very well be that percentage of voters for whom they remain a lightning rod, but it seems the hate mongering and divisiveness may be fostering it's own demise. As it should.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I would like to think so...but they get much media access for wedge stuff.
If it's divisive, the media is much more likely to cover it than it is isn't.

That's why this is so dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah, you're right there. TV loves to play it up. It's a weird Catch-22.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. But none of this would have been possible without
The aid of the press.
The press serves and amplifier by repeating the phrase that the repukes want. How many times have you heard the reporter say "Are we lousing our family values? we will explore that question next whith..."
And the ownership of the press was a key point in the takeover of the government by the right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I agree.
They decide. But if someone really wanted to make a point, I think they could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I cringe when I think of how gullible I used to be about the press.
In the '90s, when I was in my 20s, I generally assumed the media was pretty balanced.

HAH!

It took the absolutely slanted pro-Bush/anti-Gore coverage leading up to the 2000 selection and the media's sweeping under the rug of Bush's blatant theft of the presidency that really shocked me to my socks and shook me out of my slumber.

Then I started getting more and more information on the Internet and the scales quickly fell from my eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. The 4 or 5 Linguistics majors in our Anth graduating class
80's all got jobs, and no one has seen them since (they were boring and no one cared).... it all seems funny now. Some of us went on to Masters, some to police, some civil service.... the Linguists all got jobs and ....poof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Virtue on one hand and intolerance on the other....
From a link in the OP above. This is just so true, it needs to be repeated.

....."it seems to me that the right wing of the Republican Party preaches virtue on the one hand and intolerance on the other, while welcoming the money changers into the temple of government."


http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/1073
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Dean believed Bush used people who were bigots to gain his goals.
Now I am beginning to wonder if he is right.

From the book:

I hadn't started out a Bush-basher. In fact, I'd been predisposed to like George Bush. I knew him personally and had dealt with him professionally when we were both governors. He'd always been charming and hospitable to me and my family, both in the Governor's Mansion in Texas and at the White House. He'd always been more than upright in the business dealings between our states, keeping his word when he had no legal obligation to do so. What I knew of his record in Texas bespoke a moderate man who was willing to put pragmatism before ideology, to raise taxes when necessary to equalize state education spending, and to take some heat from the right wing of his party for doing so. ("I hate those people," he'd once snarled at me when I ribbed him at a White House governors' gathering about some trouble he was having in Texas with the Christian Coalition.)

....."I was astounded, then, when Bush cast moderation and conservatism aside and took up the mantle of right-wing extremism. He surrounded himself with radical ideologues and extremists: people who made a crusade of our foreign policy and polluted our government institutions with fundamentalist bigotry.....When he took aim at women through virulent anti-choice policies.."


Whatever the reason, what Bush and his administration have done is most definitely not Christian in nature.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. AAR discussing these code words now.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC