Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scarborough calls 17 crossover votes a stinging rebuke for WH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:03 PM
Original message
Scarborough calls 17 crossover votes a stinging rebuke for WH
Edited on Fri Feb-16-07 04:06 PM by 59millionmorons
I predicted 10 crossovers so I am surprised of the 17.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Senate vote will be interesting.
Great username, by the way. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. There are a number of GOP senators up for re-election in 2008.
So, I expect more than a handful to cross there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Is there any reason that there will be a vote in the Senate on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You don't think there will be a vote tomorrow?
Reid scheduled a vote for tomorrow. Do you think it'll be stopped?

From CNN:

Senate to vote Saturday

Moving quickly, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, has called a test vote for Saturday on an identical measure, and several presidential contenders in both parties rearranged their weekend campaign schedules to be present.


http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/16/us.iraq.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I only ask because the GOP blocked cloture on the Senate resolutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-17-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. And so it was -- gridlock, no cloture, no vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hopefully he will keep saying this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was hoping it would be more like 30, but I believed it would be 20.
Oh well, that still shows support is slipping. It will continue to erode as we progress through the year. And I believe this erosion will be escalated (pun intended!) when the shit from the investigations becomes known.

Bush and Cheney have done some really awful things. We here at DU know more about this than the average Murkin, (Bush's pronunciation of American) but when the dirty laundry is aired, it's over for the GOP.

How many times do they think they can get away with this shit? Watergate, Iran Contra, and now Iraq/Bushgate. It has to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. 30-60
As I posted yesterday the 30-60 crossover was a GOP spin. So they could say in the end that we didn't get close to what was predicted. Even Joe and Ariana just sniffed that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I never believed we would ever come close to 60, and I didn't really think
we would get 30, but I was trying to be positive. I tend to be a realist, so I knew even 20 was pushing it with these scumbags, but one can always hold out hope.

(I know it's a wasted effort...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Someone on KO debunked the 30-60 last night, can't remember who though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Scarborough can be difficult to pin down...
but he is one of the few reasonable voices from the right. He has not been optimistic about the GOP's recent implosion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Chuck Schumer Said
that they were pursuing a form of the resolution to get the maximum number of votes. That's one reason it's was nonbinding.

He also said that this was the first step and that they were planning to take further measures. I am not convinced they will have the will or interest -- we'll see if that happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. And who were those 17
"crossovers"? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. There were two dems that voted "nay" ...
I wonder which two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That thread has been started here (see link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. 17 shouldn't be considered "stinging", except of course the GOP has this lockstep discipline
If people thought for themselves, or we had a congress elected from more swing districts that rewarded moderate politics over divisiveness, losing 17 votes wouldn't be a big deal. But with wingers having hijacked the Republican party, 17 votes is a pretty big deal. This is another measure of a democracy in crisis that 180 Republicans would vote for a such a patently idiotic non-strategy in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. I just saw this from Truthout..
"But Vito Fossella, a Republican whose district includes Staten Island and part of Brooklyn, said the resolution would sound "a clarion call of retreat" and set the nation's foes to wondering where the United States will retreat next."

I didn't think they were that ignorant down there in Brooklyn and Staten Island!



http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/021607R.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC