His legislation would dictate how long troops can stay, the equipment they use and whether any money could be spent to expand military operations into Iran. Murtha says few units could meet the high standards he envisions, meaning Bush's plan to keep some 160,000 troops in Iraq for months on end would be thwarted.
Under his plan, he says, Democrats would be helping and not hurting troops by making sure they have what they need before being thrown into combat.
who said he "supported the troops" so he had to vote against the anti-surge resolution (yep, he's a 'puke)and challenged him to support Murtha--I ended with "You use your words to say you support the troops--now act on that with your vote!" I can hardly wait to hear back from him--wonder how he'll wiggle out of it.
Never send troops into battle without training or equipment. Never keep sending troops back without rest. Never lie to the troops about call backs or time in country. (Thanks Monkeyman!)
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.