Libby trial: "you just have to find either one of them is false"

[rodeodance]

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/20/libby-live-zeidenbergs-prosecution-summation-two/#comments


........Three separate statements. Want to make clear three things.

1) You can convict if you find any one of these three statements. You don't have to find that all three were false beyond reasonable doubt. You have to unanimously agree on any one.

2) Don't consider JUSt Russert's testimony. Consider all the testimony. When Libby says he was surprised. Consider all of them, From Martin to Grossman, all of it is relevant, and all should be considered.

Count Two, two counts of false statements. Just like with the first count, you just have to find either one of them is false. Not necessarily on both, though obviously, we think you should find him guilty on both.

Count Three, one statement.

Count Four, perjury count, that language is underlined. in instructions, you'll get underlined language.

Count Five four separate statements, all of which alleged as false. Just as with other one, you only have to find unanimously any of the four.