Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman Says War Vote Could Prompt Party Switch-Time for a recall..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:43 PM
Original message
Lieberman Says War Vote Could Prompt Party Switch-Time for a recall..
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 09:44 PM by KennedyGuy
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2865.html

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut told the Politico on Thursday that he has no immediate plans to switch parties but suggested that Democratic opposition to funding the war in Iraq might change his mind.

HOW....HOW...
do we go about creating a recall of this moron once and for all..I simply cannot believe that Liberal Connecticut is in favor of Lieberman's kissing ass with the rethugs.
he won because he said he was a DEMOCRATIC INDEPENDANT.
Can't we somehow organize a recall..
The same way the repug Pigs did a while ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mth44sc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn
He can't be "recalled"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is no recall provision in Conneticut...
...hey, what can I say. There were people here, and those among the Democratic establishment, that "stood up" for Lieberman. They made claims we knew were false, and Joe won only by garnering support of Republicans (financial and vote) and Democrats that took that duplicitous piece of shit at his word. Like Zell and Dennis Miller, and that Joe Silver guy, he just sort of "snapped" after September 11th. I hope he enjoys the Republican party, because I'd almost rather he just get it over with, because his whorish flirting with the Dubya wing of the Republican party is just too much to bear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm confused- didn't he switch parties already?
Maybe it was all a dream but at the point he decided to run AGAINST a fellow Democrat who had won the primary-- doesn't that mean he has already switched parties? Geeeeeeezzzzzz. He gives new meaning for the word schmuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
siztnarf Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Way to go Connecticut
We know your senator better than you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. That sick little son of a bitch has no power ..
so he tries to throw around a a threat to defect. Taking his toys and going home ... how immature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winston61 Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. See below
Adios, Motherfucker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mark my words
He will become a Repug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. This self-important asswipe can do whatever he wants to at this point
His legacy will be as a sore loser who certainly didn't do any good at a VP in 2000. If he wants to put an (R) next to his name...he can go the hell that way. At least he'll be living his political life honestly.

He's been pretty undependable as a Democrat anyway. He's just another ZellOut.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Didn't Traitor Joe get 23% of the Democratic vote in Connecticut?
I wonder what those Democrats now think about their choice? Hope they feel as DUMB as they've proven themselves to be for not voting for Lamont!

Then again...I'm in California and Democrats voted for a Bush-Republican, Schwarzenegger, again, because Angelides was "so boring".

With "boring" Angelides, we had a chance at single-payer Universal Healthcare via Sheila Keuhl's SB 840 bill---with far more exciting Auhnuld we get...um...Well, he vetoed the bill but...but...he wasn't boring! That alone helps in keeping us Californians healthy, right? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Asshole-Joe is the biggeest POS to ever sully a senate seat.
This whiny turn-coat asshole is beyond repulsion. He's the reason we lost in 2000, not those few hundred votes in florida. If he hadn't been such a whiny little shit and had shown some balls as a Democrat, maybe he would have some legitimacy as an independent or a repuke. But this guy has absolutely no credibility, no ethics, no sense of what is right, and no balls. All he cares about is himself, and though I only wish ill on garbage like the Bushes and Cheneys, I hope this POS becomes debilitated requiring another election before he changes parties. And what's more, I hope the turncoat asshole pos reads this so he'll know how people who have consciences feel about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Traitor Joe forgets he's from a Blue state.. and a question about Angelides..

..since you brought him up.

How on earth did the most populated state in the nation.. .. the bluest state in the nation.. ... ever wind up with him as their nominee anyway??

Was it that there just wasn't quality candidates that wanted to go up against Ahnold?



I've always wondered ----- WHY.. with so MANY Democrats... How --- WHY --- HIM??

Thanks for shedding any light!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Don't really know if I can "shed any light" regarding Angelides as Cali's choice...
...but I really don't think California is "the bluest State of the Union". I think it's more "purple" than blue. From what I've read, Massachusetts is the bluest state although Cali is up there surely in the top 5.

I personally voted for Steve Westly. So did my sons, and my son's friend, and all of my friends. I don't know of anyone who had voted for Angelides in the primary, but he won BIG against Westly although all statistics showed that Westly would've won easily from Schwarzenegger compared to Angelides.

I--personally--believe the primary was rigged. Diebold had been de-certified and removed from use in elections by Kevin Shelley after the recall when Schwarzenegger won over Davis. In December of 2005, I received notice from Brad Blog that as Shelley fought off allegations of fraud, and bribery and he had to step down, Auhnuld appointed Bruce McPherson who immediately took steps to RE-certify the already proven-faulty Diebold machines.

In early January 2006, McPherson re-certified the Diebold machines no matter the reports that they were unreliable, and they were used in the primaries, as well as the election.

Is it just coincidence that Steve Westly--the Democrat most likely to defeat Schwarzenegger in an election--loses against Angelides in the primary? Angelides that showed weak in the polls against both Westly AND Schwarzenegger, yet he wins from Westly???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is the guy the party supported while starving the campaign of the legitimate primary winner
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Guess the Lieberman supporters on DU have finally given up.
-Joe has to vote that way because the dems in his state are conservative...

-Support Joe in the primary b/c if he loses the repub will win...

-Support Joe in the election b/c ??? (There were very, very few votes along this theme after Joe bolted from the party and chose to pretend that the primaries are not really a functioning part of democracy...

-If you don't like Joe - it must be because you are are prejudiced ...

We finally no longer have to read posts along those lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's been lording this over the dems since the election
He LOVES it. Sick bastard.

Unfortunately, I think it would be very difficult to recall an independent, if it could be done at all. From what I understand, that is usually initiated at the party level.

Perhaps Senate dems should court Hagel- if he doesn't run for pres,of course. What other rethug senators are willing to depart from the WH script? Lincoln Chafee would have been perfect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. He ALREADY switched parties from (D) to (I).
This guy is an epic assclown. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wetcanvas Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. No recall...
Edited on Fri Feb-23-07 10:41 AM by wetcanvas
No recall...we had our candidate and he lost.
Joe was voted in with great assistance of the CT right and for lack of a better definition, Reagandemocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. the GOP weighed in heavily on that election
It was a travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. Wonder how he's going handle re-defining the arena
My guess and my gut says that he's going to fight with everything he has to NOT tie the hands of Bush! I...can't...stand...him!!!!! I can't stand to look at him. I can't stand to listen to him. I can't stand to even read his quoted threats! :argh:

FFS!!! This "I'm gonna switch! I'll do it!" is such bullshit someone should sit him down and have no fear! He's threatening to switch over one issue while proclaim his strongly "Democratic" voting record needs to be stared down. Ok, Joe...if you play that card are you going to then threaten the Cons with "I'll switch back! I swear I will! I'm gonna do it!"? They'll eat him for breakfast like the snakes they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. He may be the first to run on a Dem and GOP ticket
I don't think that's been done before. He will surely be on the short list of any GOP POTUS candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC